BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai120Mumbai88Indore78Delhi75Bangalore59Surat34Karnataka25Kolkata22Lucknow22Cuttack16Ahmedabad16Kerala14Hyderabad13Jaipur12Visakhapatnam8Allahabad7Rajkot6Panaji5Pune4Amritsar4Jabalpur3Chandigarh3Nagpur2Raipur2Cochin2SC2Guwahati1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)16Section 1448Penalty8Addition to Income8Section 1725Section 1945

PACC CONTAINER LINE PTE LIMITED,NELLOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NELLORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 25/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 172Section 194

u/s 172 of the Act either before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or before the Tribunal. He had drawn our attention to section 246 of the I.T. Act which provides as under : “Appealable orders. 246. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any assessee aggrieved by any of the following orders of an Assessing Officer (other than

PACC CONTAINER LINE PTE LIMITED,NELLORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NELLORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 26/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 172Section 194

u/s 172 of the Act either before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or before the Tribunal. He had drawn our attention to section 246 of the I.T. Act which provides as under : “Appealable orders. 246. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any assessee aggrieved by any of the following orders of an Assessing Officer (other than

PACC CONTAINER LINE PTE LIMITED,NELLORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NELLORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 27/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 172Section 194

u/s 172 of the Act either before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or before the Tribunal. He had drawn our attention to section 246 of the I.T. Act which provides as under : “Appealable orders. 246. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any assessee aggrieved by any of the following orders of an Assessing Officer (other than

PACC CONTAINER LINE PTE LIMITED ,SINGAPORE REP BY ITS INDIAN AGENT M/S J M BAXI & CO ,NELLORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) , NELLORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 550/HYD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 172Section 194

u/s 172 of the Act either before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or before the Tribunal. He had drawn our attention to section 246 of the I.T. Act which provides as under : “Appealable orders. 246. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any assessee aggrieved by any of the following orders of an Assessing Officer (other than

PACC CONTAINER LINE PTE LIMITED ,SINGAPORE REP BY ITS INDIAN AGENT M/S J M BAXI & CO,NELLORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NELLORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 551/HYD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 172Section 194

u/s 172 of the Act either before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or before the Tribunal. He had drawn our attention to section 246 of the I.T. Act which provides as under : “Appealable orders. 246. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), any assessee aggrieved by any of the following orders of an Assessing Officer (other than

GRR HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 366/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 368/HYD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 372/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 373/HYD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 371/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 369/HYD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 370/HYD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty

GRR HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 367/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

E R Per S. S. Godara, J.M. These twin assessees’ eight appeals for A.Ys. 2014-15 to 2018-19 arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals) – 11, Hyderabad’s separate orders, all dated 31.08.2021 passed in ITA Nos.366 to 373/Hyd/2021 case Nos.10307/2015-16, 11406/2016-17, 10527/2017-18, 10262/2013-14, 10282/2014-15, 10308/2015-16, 11407/2016-17, and 10528/2017-18, respectively, affirming the Assessing Officer’s action imposing penalty