BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi123Mumbai107Jaipur60Ahmedabad40Raipur36Chennai36Pune29Allahabad20Kolkata14Rajkot14Nagpur14Chandigarh14Visakhapatnam13Panaji13Bangalore12Lucknow10Indore8Hyderabad6Jabalpur5Surat4Ranchi3Dehradun2SC2Cochin1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 14710Section 69A6Section 143(3)5Addition to Income3Section 148(2)2Section 1482Section 143(2)2Section 142(1)2Reassessment

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. B.RAMALINGA RAJU , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 55/HYD/2020[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2025AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

160/- from Salary & Other Sources. The original assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 04.03.2005. Later, the case was reopened under section 147 of the Act and a reassessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was passed on 21.07.2010. On review, the CIT(C) found that key issues, including diversion of funds and the opening balance of the suspense account

2
Reopening of Assessment2

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. B.RAMALINGA RAJU, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 57/HYD/2020[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2025AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)

160/- from Salary & Other Sources. The original assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 04.03.2005. Later, the case was reopened under section 147 of the Act and a reassessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 was passed on 21.07.2010. On review, the CIT(C) found that key issues, including diversion of funds and the opening balance of the suspense account

REEMA AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 353/HYD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2026AY 2014-15
For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: \nDr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR
Section 111ASection 139(1)

160 taxmann.com 567 (Orissa-HC);\niii. Order of ITAT, Kolkata Bench in the case of Chandra\nPrakash Jhunjhunwala, Kolkata vs. DCIT, CC-3(4),\nKolkata in ITA.No.2351/Kol./2017, Dated 09.08.2019;\niv. Order of ITAT, Kolkata Bench in the case of M/s.\nNicholson Vanijya Pvt. Ltd., C/o. RSVPC & Company vs.\nvs. ITO, Ward-1(2), Kolkata in ITA.No.1856/Kol./2018

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 530/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

160/-. Notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1)\nwere issued with a detailed questionnaire and responses were submitted by the\nassessee's authorized reproduced.\n\nThe Assessment Order is reproduced in Para 4 above. In the\nAssessment order, the AO observed that:\ni)\nDuring the search action documents such as agreements, cash\nreceipts, and monthly collection sheets were seized, which

SURESH KUMAR REDDY KRISHNAPURAM,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 539/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Penalty u/s.270A of the Act is initiated separately for non-reporting of income.\n\n9. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A). Before the learned CIT(A), the assessee challenged the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of 14% profit on disclosed\n\nturnover and also estimation of 18% profit on suppressed

MRL TRADING COMPANY,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-7(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 29/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nCA A SrinivasFor Respondent: \nMS Kritika Jaiswal, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 69A

271 1,350\n8,132\n12,46,470\n16\n22,141 6,186 1,743\n3,319\n25,91,450\n17\n20,527 2,586 965\n4,416\n22,45,460\n18\n14,514 2,338 880\n5,104\n4\n16,36,960\n19 138\n4,329 1,548 1,160