Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai29 Delhi3 Hyderabad3 Surat2 Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 10(38)4 Section 111A3 Disallowance3 Section 143(3)2 Exemption2 Addition to Income2 Set Off of Losses2

REEMA AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 353/HYD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

For Appellant: CA P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: \nDr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT-DR

Section 111ASection 139(1)

111A of the Income\nTax Act, 1961.\n9. The Id CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that the AO has\nnot doubted the purchase of shares in D-MAT Form agency, hence\nsale cannot be bogus.\n10. The Id CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that the sale\ntransaction between the appellant and the other party

TARUN KUMAR GOYAL (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2093/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed

REEMA AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

TARUN KUMAR GOYAL (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

REEMA AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

TARUN KUMAR GOYAL (HUF),HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

TARUN KUMAR GOYAL (HUF) ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD