Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi150 Mumbai93 Bangalore39 Raipur33 Ahmedabad16 Chennai12 Jaipur12 Visakhapatnam11 Kolkata6 Chandigarh6 Indore5 Lucknow5 Guwahati5 Surat3 Pune2 Agra1 Hyderabad1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2 Section 1952 Section 1322 Section 143(2)2

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. TRIDENT CHEMPHAR LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 433/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2017-18 Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Trident Chemphar Ltd. Hyderabad. Tax, Central Circle – 2(1), Pan : Aaeft8416H. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri B.G. Reddy Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Kumar – Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.01.2023

For Appellant: Shri B.G. ReddyFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar – CIT-DR

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 195Section 40

271], wherein it was held as under: "The main thrust in such a situation is whether the commission made to overseas agents, who are non-resident entities, and who render services only at such particular place, is assessable to tax. Sec. 195 very clearly speaks that unless the income is liable to be taxed in India, there is no obligation