BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

257 results for “house property”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,371Delhi1,643Bangalore652Chennai457Karnataka424Ahmedabad424Kolkata421Jaipur351Hyderabad257Chandigarh227Pune226Cochin169Indore148Visakhapatnam109Rajkot79Raipur78Telangana72Amritsar68Surat68Cuttack62Lucknow53Nagpur48Patna45SC45Calcutta40Guwahati26Agra21Jodhpur17Dehradun10Kerala7Varanasi7Allahabad6Rajasthan4Panaji4Jabalpur3Orissa2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Ranchi1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Addition to Income65Section 143(3)56Section 13231Search & Seizure31Section 26327House Property25Deduction25Section 132(4)22Section 153A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. CACHE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 124/HYD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Sri Rohit Mujumdar, D.R
Section 115Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 263

set aside the issue to the file of the AO for re-consideration of the matter on case laws applicable on the issue involved. The AO thereafter reconsidered the issue and has held that the ‘income from house property’ declared by the assessee has to be treated as ‘income from business’. He accordingly computed the income from business at Rs.8

Showing 1–20 of 257 · Page 1 of 13

...
21
Section 143(2)21
Disallowance19
Section 14716

CACHE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 571/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Respondent: Smt. Neeju Gupta, DR
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 24

loss of Rs. 1,51,03,227/-. The assessee was therefore asked to explain as to why the rental income should not be treated as ‘Income from business’ as assessee was carrying on the business of leasing of premises during the relevant assessment year. Vide reply dt. 07-11-2016, the assessee stated that the their company is engaged

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 166/HYD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar RampurwalaFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 80I

set off against loss from other business units of the assessee or on account of loss from other heads of income, then there would not be any income from such eligible business which is subjected to tax at all. Under the circumstances, if the assessee is also having income from house property

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 165/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Sept 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar RampurwalaFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 80I

set off against loss from other business units of the assessee or on account of loss from other heads of income, then there would not be any income from such eligible business which is subjected to tax at all. Under the circumstances, if the assessee is also having income from house property

THE SECUNDERBAD CLUB ,HYDERABAD vs. ITO WARD -10(2), HYDERABAD

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 166/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri L.Jeevanlal, DR
Section 143(3)

property without applying the doctrine of mutuality. Treatment of operating losses as business loss u/s.28(iii) of the Act and Set off of operating loss against income from other sources and house

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. CACHE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of revenue are dismissed

ITA 65/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Jun 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 24

set up of infrastructure required by the lessee. The annexure - A to the lease deeds lists out the facilities to be provided by the assessee to the tenant and for the sake of convenience and ready reference, the annexure - A to the lease deed between the assessee and TATA Motors Ltd., in respect of the :- 7 -: ITA Nos. 64 & 65/Hyd/2020

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. CACHE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of revenue are dismissed

ITA 64/HYD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Jun 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 24

set up of infrastructure required by the lessee. The annexure - A to the lease deeds lists out the facilities to be provided by the assessee to the tenant and for the sake of convenience and ready reference, the annexure - A to the lease deed between the assessee and TATA Motors Ltd., in respect of the :- 7 -: ITA Nos. 64 & 65/Hyd/2020

HIMA BINDU PUTTA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3), HYDERABAD

Appeal stands allowed

ITA 523/HYD/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 May 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi

For Appellant: Sri B.Sai Prasad, AdvFor Respondent: Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey, D.R
Section 143Section 23Section 24

loss from house property of (-) Rs. 9,31,723/- while she admitted rental income of Rs. 15 lacs. The Assessing Officer observed that the tenant of the assessee is OSI Consulting Pvt Limited which in turn has provided residential accommodation to Sri Y. Anil Kumar, the husband of the assessee, and that the assessee is residing with her husband. Therefore

LAKSHMI SHANKAR GUMUDAVELLI ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA No. 144/Hyd/2020 filed by the assessee is allowed, whereas ITA No

ITA 148/HYD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dinesh Paruchuri, Sr.AR
Section 143(3)Section 154

loss was set off against Income from Other Source and Income from House Property by the appellant. The appellant further

LAKSHMI SHANKAR GUMUDAVELLI ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(4) , HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA No. 144/Hyd/2020 filed by the assessee is allowed, whereas ITA No

ITA 144/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Dinesh Paruchuri, Sr.AR
Section 143(3)Section 154

loss was set off against Income from Other Source and Income from House Property by the appellant. The appellant further

HYDERABAD INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1856/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana &For Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 92C

loss of Rs.2,56,00,872/- on 30.11.2015. In view of the international transactions involved during the year under consideration, for determination of Arm’s Length Price (“ALP”), the case was referred to Learned Transfer Pricing Officer (“TPO”). The Ld. TPO vide his order dated 30.10.2018 proposed upward ITA-TP No.1856/Hyd/2019 4 adjustment of Rs.1528,39,699/- u/s. 92CA

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. L & T METRO RAIL (HYDERABAD) LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 1412/HYD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godaraassessment Year: 2016-17 Dcit, Vs. L & T Metro Rail Circle-16(1), (Hyderabad) Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aabcl 8521 D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Ashik Shah Revenue By: Sri B. Sunil Kumar, Dr Date Of Hearing: 25/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 21/01/2022 Order Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Am.:

For Appellant: Shri Ashik ShahFor Respondent: Sri B. Sunil Kumar, DR
Section 143(3)Section 56

loss incurred by the assessee in the relevant accounting year. In such a situation, the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purpose of setting up its business cannot be allowed as deduction, nor can it be adjusted against any other income under any other head. Similarly, any income from a non-business source cannot be set off against

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. KSK WIND ENERGY HALAGALI BENCHI PRIVATE LIMIED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are allowed

ITA 33/HYD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godaraassessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ksk Wind Energy Ward-2(1), Halagali Benchi Private Hyderabad. Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaeck 1965 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue By: Sri Sunil Gowtham, Sr. Ar Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ksk Wind Power Ward-2(1), Sankonahatti Athni Hyderabad. Private Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaeck 1900 C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue By: Sri Sunil Gowtham, Sr. Ar Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ksk Wind Power Ward-2(1), Aminabhavi Chikodi Hyderabad. Private Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaeck 1888 R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Sri Sunil Gowtham, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 56

loss incurred by the assessee in the relevant accounting year. In such a situation, the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purpose of setting up its business cannot be allowed as deduction, nor can it be adjusted against any other income under any other head. Similarly, any income from a non-business source cannot be set off against

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. KSK WIND POWER SANKONAHATTI ATHNI PRIVATE LIMIED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are allowed

ITA 34/HYD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godaraassessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ksk Wind Energy Ward-2(1), Halagali Benchi Private Hyderabad. Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaeck 1965 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue By: Sri Sunil Gowtham, Sr. Ar Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ksk Wind Power Ward-2(1), Sankonahatti Athni Hyderabad. Private Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaeck 1900 C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue By: Sri Sunil Gowtham, Sr. Ar Assessment Year: 2014-15 Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ksk Wind Power Ward-2(1), Aminabhavi Chikodi Hyderabad. Private Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaeck 1888 R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Sri Sunil Gowtham, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 56

loss incurred by the assessee in the relevant accounting year. In such a situation, the expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purpose of setting up its business cannot be allowed as deduction, nor can it be adjusted against any other income under any other head. Similarly, any income from a non-business source cannot be set off against

P.C. PANTULU, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals for the AYs

ITA 275/HYD/2017[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Aug 2018AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri B. Ramakotaiah

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 24(1)Section 24(2)Section 71Section 71(3)

loss’ which can be set-off to other incomes as restrictions u/s. 71(2A) of the Act were applicable only from AY. 2005-06 and not before. In view of that, grounds on this issue are considered allowed. 6.2. Next issue for consideration is the claim of interest on house property

P.C. PANTULU, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals for the AYs

ITA 277/HYD/2017[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Aug 2018AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri B. Ramakotaiah

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 24(1)Section 24(2)Section 71Section 71(3)

loss’ which can be set-off to other incomes as restrictions u/s. 71(2A) of the Act were applicable only from AY. 2005-06 and not before. In view of that, grounds on this issue are considered allowed. 6.2. Next issue for consideration is the claim of interest on house property

P.C. PANTULU, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals for the AYs

ITA 278/HYD/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Aug 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri B. Ramakotaiah

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 24(1)Section 24(2)Section 71Section 71(3)

loss’ which can be set-off to other incomes as restrictions u/s. 71(2A) of the Act were applicable only from AY. 2005-06 and not before. In view of that, grounds on this issue are considered allowed. 6.2. Next issue for consideration is the claim of interest on house property

SECUNDERABAD CLUB,HYDERABAD vs. ITO WARD-10(2), HYDERABAD

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 153/HYD/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L. P. Sahu(Through Virtual Hearing) M/S. Secunderabad Club, Hyderabad. Pan Aaaat2534E …..Appellant. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(2), Hyderabad. …..Respondent. Appellant By : None. Respondent By : Shri Paruchuri Dinesh. (D.R.) Date Of Hearing : 18.10.2021. Date Of Pronouncement : 16.11.2021. O R D E R Per Shri S.S. Godara, J.M. : This Assessee’S Appeal For Asst. Year 2013-14 Arises From The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Hyderabad’S Order Dt.16.02.2018 Passed In Case No.0051/2016-17/B2/Cit(A)-6 In Proceedings Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’).

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Paruchuri Dinesh. (D.R.)
Section 14Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(vii)Section 71

loss of Rs.4,07,27,370 arising from mutuality account as a deficit has not eligible to be set off against income from other sources and house property

BBR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in part and for statistical purposes

ITA 367/HYD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Babu KN, Sr. AR
Section 115JSection 143(3)

House Property. 6. On this aspect, since verification is necessary, we deem it just and proper to direct the learned Assessing Officer to verify the Memorandum/Articles of Association/relevant part of the audited annual accounts as to the clarification on the aspect of the business/profession of the assessee and if it is construction and letting out of the property then

MEENAKSHI ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 291/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.291/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Meenakshi Energy & Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Infrastructure Holdings (P) Circle 5 (1) Ltd, Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aafcm6917L (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Advocate Shri A.V. Raghuram रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By:: Shri K.Meghanath Chowhan,(Cit)Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 21/05/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 27/06/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Advocate Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: : Shri K.Meghanath Chowhan,(CIT)DR
Section 72(1)

Properties and Investments Ltd vs. CIT reported in (2015) 231 Taxmann 336 (S.C). Therefore, we are of the considered opinion that the Assessing Officer and the learned CIT (A) erred in assessing the interest income earned from inter-corporate deposits under the head income from other sources. 11. Having said so, let’s come back to the issue that