GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-6(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD
In the result, appeals of the assessee and revenue are dismissed in above terms
ITA 1355/HYD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Sept 2021AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year: 2011-12 Giridhari Constructions, Vs Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward – 6(2), Hyderabad. Pan – Aagfg 5289D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Asst. Commissioner Of Vs Giridhari Constructions, Income Tax, Hyderabad. Circle – 14(1), Hyderabad. Pan – Aagfg 5289D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao Revenue By: Shri Rohit Mujumdar Date Of Hearing: 05/04/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/09/2021 O R D E R Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: Both These Appeals Are Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Are Directed Against Cit(A) - 4, Hyderabad’S Order Dated 24/09/2015 For Ay 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 143(3)Section 801Section 80I
property and verify the eligibility of the housing project for claim of deduction u/ s 80AB(10) of the Act. The report had substantiated the fact that 7 buildings
(Blocks) out of 10 buildings (Blocks) are complete and 322
flats out of 518 flats are completed. The AO based on the valuation report of DVO of the department disallowed
