BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “house property”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur101Mumbai76Delhi69Chandigarh56Bangalore46Rajkot19Agra18Indore14Amritsar13Hyderabad12Ahmedabad11Cochin10Pune9Raipur6Surat6Chennai5Varanasi5Cuttack4SC3Allahabad2Jodhpur2Dehradun2Nagpur1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 69B37Section 115B16Section 153A15Section 13213Addition to Income12Search & Seizure10Section 69A9House Property9Section 697Section 234A

RONAK GUPTA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of assessees are dismissed

ITA 120/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Narahari BiswalFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 115BSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234ASection 68Section 69B

69B, section 69C or section 69D, if such income is not covered under clause (a), the income-tax payable shall be the aggregate of— ii) the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable had his total income been reduced by the amount of income referred to in clause N.] (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this

6
Section 143(2)6
Business Income6

SUPREME AGRO,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of assessees are dismissed

ITA 121/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Narahari BiswalFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 115BSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234ASection 68Section 69B

69B, section 69C or section 69D, if such income is not covered under clause (a), the income-tax payable shall be the aggregate of— ii) the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable had his total income been reduced by the amount of income referred to in clause N.] (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this

KANISHKA GUPTA,,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of assessees are dismissed

ITA 119/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Narahari BiswalFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 115BSection 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234ASection 68Section 69B

69B, section 69C or section 69D, if such income is not covered under clause (a), the income-tax payable shall be the aggregate of— ii) the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable had his total income been reduced by the amount of income referred to in clause N.] (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this

SRINIVAS CHOWDARY VALLABANENI,SECUNDERAB vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1462/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1462/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Shri Srinivas Chowdary Vs. Dy.Cit Vallabaneni, Secunderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Aeipv3757R Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Phaneendra Nag, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Ranjan Agrawala, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 17/11/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 26/11/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Phaneendra Nag, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Ranjan Agrawala, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 271ASection 69B

house property and income from other sources. A search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) was conducted on 05.10.2018 in the cases of various persons, including the assessee. Subsequently, the assessee filed return of income for Assessment Year 2019–20 under section 139(1) of the Act on 31.08.2019, admitting a total

DUSHYANTH REDDY JANAMPALLY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 315/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. Mookambikeyan, Sr.AR
Section 115BSection 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69Section 69B

69B to section 69 of the Income Tax Act.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that assessee, an individual, having income from house property

DUSHYANTH REDDY JANAMPALLY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 316/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. Mookambikeyan, Sr.AR
Section 115BSection 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69Section 69B

69B to section 69 of the Income Tax Act.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that assessee, an individual, having income from house property

DUSHYANTH REDDY JANAMPALLY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 317/HYD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Nov 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri S. Mookambikeyan, Sr.AR
Section 115BSection 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 69Section 69B

69B to section 69 of the Income Tax Act.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that assessee, an individual, having income from house property

SABITHA ANAND HOSPITAL,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 597/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2017-18 M/S.Sabitha Anand Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Hospital, Hyderabad Central Circle 3(3) Pan:Abwfs9326E Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri A.V. Raghuram, Advocate Revenue By: Shri Kumar Aditya, Dr Date Of Hearing: 02/03/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/03/2023 Order Per R.K. Panda, A.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 7.9.2022 Of The Learned Cit (A)-11, Hyderabad, Relating To A.Y.2017-18. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is A Partnership Firm Engaged In The Business Of Running A Hospital In The Name Of M/S. Sabitha Anand Hospitals. It Filed Its Original Return Of Income On 28.10.2017 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.10,70,540/-. A Survey U/S 133A Of The Act Was Conducted In The Case Of The Assessee On 27.9.2016. Consequent To The Survey Operation, The Assessee Filed A Revised Computation Of Income Of Page 1 Of 17

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 69

house property. The assessee also argued that the assessee has utilized inferior quality of material which is not at par with the specification of the material as per govt. standard for which the DVO himself gave a deduction of 10%. Further, it was argued that the construction of the building started in financial year

VALLABHANENI SRINIVAS CHOWDARY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA 175/Hyd/2023 & 176/Hyd/2023 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 177/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Anne Rajeswara Rao Vs. A.C.I.T Hyderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Ablpa4688A Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Anne Manoj Chowdary Vs. A.C.I.T Hyderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Ainpc5963B Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Vallabhaneni Srinivas Vs. A.C.I.T Chowdary Central Circle 1(4) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aeipv3757R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K. Vijay Kumar, Advocate Revenue By: Smt.K. Haritha, Dr Date Of Hearing: 01/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2023 Order Per Bench: The Above Appeals Filed By The Respective Assessees Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 23.01.2023 Of The Page 1 Of 16

For Appellant: Shri K. Vijay Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.K. Haritha, DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 69A

house property and other sources. A search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Subhagraha Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd along with its group companies and connected concerns/individuals on 5.10.2018 during which the case of the assessee was also covered. The assessee filed his return of income

ANNE RAJESWARA RAO,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA 175/Hyd/2023 & 176/Hyd/2023 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 175/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Anne Rajeswara Rao Vs. A.C.I.T Hyderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Ablpa4688A Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Anne Manoj Chowdary Vs. A.C.I.T Hyderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Ainpc5963B Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Vallabhaneni Srinivas Vs. A.C.I.T Chowdary Central Circle 1(4) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aeipv3757R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K. Vijay Kumar, Advocate Revenue By: Smt.K. Haritha, Dr Date Of Hearing: 01/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2023 Order Per Bench: The Above Appeals Filed By The Respective Assessees Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 23.01.2023 Of The Page 1 Of 16

For Appellant: Shri K. Vijay Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.K. Haritha, DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 69A

house property and other sources. A search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Subhagraha Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd along with its group companies and connected concerns/individuals on 5.10.2018 during which the case of the assessee was also covered. The assessee filed his return of income

ANNE MANOJ CHOWDARY ,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA 175/Hyd/2023 & 176/Hyd/2023 are allowed and ITA No

ITA 176/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Anne Rajeswara Rao Vs. A.C.I.T Hyderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Ablpa4688A Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Anne Manoj Chowdary Vs. A.C.I.T Hyderabad Central Circle 1(4) Pan:Ainpc5963B Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Vallabhaneni Srinivas Vs. A.C.I.T Chowdary Central Circle 1(4) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aeipv3757R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri K. Vijay Kumar, Advocate Revenue By: Smt.K. Haritha, Dr Date Of Hearing: 01/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/08/2023 Order Per Bench: The Above Appeals Filed By The Respective Assessees Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Dated 23.01.2023 Of The Page 1 Of 16

For Appellant: Shri K. Vijay Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.K. Haritha, DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 69A

house property and other sources. A search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Subhagraha Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd along with its group companies and connected concerns/individuals on 5.10.2018 during which the case of the assessee was also covered. The assessee filed his return of income

RAMA MOHAN SOMA,ANANTAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, HINDUPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 180/HYD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accounant Member Assessment Year: 2012-13 Rama Mohan Soma, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, H.No.12-274-3, Bypass Ward – 1, Road, Kadiri, Anantapur, Hindupur. Andhra Pradesh – 515591. Pan : Aocps8172D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri G. Srinivasa Rao, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Sr.Ar. Date Of Hearing: 02.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.05.2024 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. The Appeal Of The Assessee For A.Y. 2012-13 Arises From Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi Dt.27.12.2023 Invoking Proceedings Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 147 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, “The Act”). 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Read As Under :

For Appellant: Shri G. Srinivasa Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, Sr.AR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 254Section 69B

section 69B of the Act has no relevance to the facts of the case and hence the said addition of Rs. 50,00,000/- wrongly made u/s 69B of the Act is liable to be deleted. 5. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi erred in not passing the speaking order against the Ground