Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai86 Delhi33 Kolkata14 Ahmedabad13 Pune12 Raipur8 Bangalore7 Jaipur5 Surat3 Chandigarh3 Hyderabad3 Rajkot3 Indore2 Chennai2 Nagpur1 Cochin1 Agra1 Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 54F6 Section 143(3)3 Section 2(47)2 Addition to Income2

N PADMAJA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

Appeal are dismissed

ITA 2248/HYD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Apr 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu(Through Physical Hearing) Smt. Nandamuri Padmaja Devi, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Ramakrishna 70 Mm, Of Income Tax, Ntr Estates, Abids, Circle 2(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad-500 001 Pan Aaxpn 3203B Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri G.Kalyan Das & Shri A. harishFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Majumdar (D.R.)

Section 143(3)Section 254

Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). 2 Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. The assessee has raised the following substantive grounds in the instant appeal : “ 1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is contrary to law and the facts. 2. Authorities below erred in not accepting Capital Gains

N PADMAJA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

DCIT,CENT CIR-2(4), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. CLEAN CITY ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

N PADMAJA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

DCIT,CENT CIR-2(4), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. CLEAN CITY ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-11(1), HYDERABAD vs. LATE SHRI IENENI SRIPATHIRAO L/R IENENI SHASHIKANT, HYDERABAD