BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi68Chandigarh55Indore20Bangalore19Mumbai13Pune11Chennai11Ahmedabad9Jaipur8Raipur8Hyderabad6Surat5Dehradun4Kolkata3SC3Cochin3Patna2Rajkot2Jodhpur2Nagpur2Varanasi1Calcutta1Jabalpur1Karnataka1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 54F14Section 54B10Section 143(1)6Section 10A5Section 143(3)4Deduction4Exemption4Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 143(2)

KRISHNA KISHORE REDDY MANYAM ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(4) , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed\nfor statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 58/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Jun 2025AY 2008-09
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 548Section 54BSection 54F

property were to be\nallowed only to the extent the same were made by him before the\n“due date” for filing of his return of income. We say so, for the\nreason that Section 54F of the Act, inter alia, contemplates the\nutilization of the \"net consideration" towards the purchase or\nconstruction of the new house before the “date

DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

2
Section 133A2
Section 2(14)2

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 151/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Dbs Technology Income Tax, Services India Private Circle – 8(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.2/Hyd/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Dbs Technology Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Circle – 8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Cross Objector / (Appellant/Revenue) Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm: The Appeal & Cross-Objection Filed By The Revenue For A.Y. 2019-20 Arise From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi

For Appellant: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)

54B or section 54D or section 54EC or section 54F or section 54G or section 54GA or section 54GB] or Chapter VI-A exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year

AHMED ALAM KHAN,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 167/HYD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Mar 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman(Virtual Hearing) & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Sashank Dundu, ARFor Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 263Section 54Section 54B

property in ITR is less than sale consideration reported in Form 26QB(Form 26QB and Schedule CG of ITR), and (2) large deduction claimed under section 54B, 54C, 54G and 54GA (schedule CG of ITR). 11. Learned Assessing Officer by way of notice dated 04/07/2017 to the assessee, requiring details as to the sale consideration for computing the capital gains

GUNDALA SARVOTTAM RAO,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3), HYDERABAD

The appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1668/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / प्रत् यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 54BSection 54F

54B of the Act and also allowed the claim of agricultural income. In respect of the claim of exemption under section 54F of the Act, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the file of the learned Assessing Officer for deciding the said issue afresh after conducting necessary enquiry and directed the assessee to produce necessary evidence to show that

GUNDALA MAHENDER,,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3), HYDERABAD

The appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1669/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / प्रत् यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 54BSection 54F

54B of the Act and also allowed the claim of agricultural income. In respect of the claim of exemption under section 54F of the Act, the Tribunal set aside the issue to the file of the learned Assessing Officer for deciding the said issue afresh after conducting necessary enquiry and directed the assessee to produce necessary evidence to show that

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. LAKSHMI NARAYANA TURAIRAO , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 232/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jul 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri Shakeer Ahmed, DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(14)Section 54B

Section 2(14) of IT Act, ignoring the fact that the said land fell within 8 Kms from the municipal limits of Hyderabad. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the 1d.CIT (A) erred in following decision of Honble ITAT in the case of Srinivas Pandit HUF vs ITO Ward