DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Dbs Technology Income Tax, Services India Private Circle – 8(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.2/Hyd/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Dbs Technology Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Circle – 8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Cross Objector / (Appellant/Revenue) Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm: The Appeal & Cross-Objection Filed By The Revenue For A.Y. 2019-20 Arise From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi

4A) or sub-section (4B) or sub-section (4C) or sub-section (4D) [or sub-section (4E)] [or sub- section (4F)] of section 139 or clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 142 1[or section 148] or section 153A [***] relating to the assessment year commencing [on the 1st day of April, 1a[2023]] shall,— [(a) in the case

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

MADHUSUDHAN JAJU,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SANGAREDDY

In the result, the C.O. of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

4A) Every person in receipt of income derived from property held under trust or\nother legal obligation wholly for charitable or religious purposes or in part only for\nsuch purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause\n(iia) of clause (24) of section 2, shall, if the total income in respect of which

SIVA PRASAD REDDY BUCHEPALLI,CHIMAKURTHY vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

house property, business and other sources. The assessee filed his original return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Subsequently, search and Seizure operation u/s. 132 of Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s.KMR Estates and Builders Private Limited and also on the directors of the company

SIVA PRASAD REDDY BUCHEPALLI,CHIMAKURTHY vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

house property, business and other sources. The assessee filed his original return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Subsequently, search and Seizure operation u/s. 132 of Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s.KMR Estates and Builders Private Limited and also on the directors of the company

NAGA LAKSHMI BUCHEPALLI,CHIMAKURTHY vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

house property, business and other sources. The assessee filed his original return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Subsequently, search and Seizure operation u/s. 132 of Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s.KMR Estates and Builders Private Limited and also on the directors of the company

NAGA LAKSHMI BUCHEPALLI,CHIMAKURTHY vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

house property, business and other sources. The assessee filed his original return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Subsequently, search and Seizure operation u/s. 132 of Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s.KMR Estates and Builders Private Limited and also on the directors of the company

RAMESH CHANDRA MAJITHIA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

house property, business and other sources. The assessee filed his original return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of Rs.Nil. Subsequently, search and Seizure operation u/s. 132 of Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s.KMR Estates and Builders Private Limited and also on the directors of the company

AGRO TECH FOODS LIMITED., SEC'BAD,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Properties vs. Director of Income- tax (supra). The contention of the assessee in this case was that, the order framed on the directions given by the DDIT u/s 144A of the Act, could not be revised u/s 263 of the Act, as to the extent, the Assessing Officer could not be said to have applied his mind. The Tribunal held