BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “house property”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka323Delhi180Mumbai92Bangalore92Ahmedabad79Chandigarh58Kolkata32Jaipur30Chennai22Lucknow22Hyderabad9Indore9Telangana8Visakhapatnam5SC4Varanasi4Surat2Pune2Rajkot2Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1Agra1Nagpur1Orissa1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Section 44A5Natural Justice5Comparables/TP5Addition to Income4

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)., HYDERABAD vs. KSK ENERGY COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of revenue are allowed

ITA 1663/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt. Nivedita Biswas
Section 143(3)

House of Lords that in order to claim a deduction, it is enough to show that the money is expended, not of necessity and with a view to direct and immediate benefit, but voluntarily and on grounds of commercial expediency and in order to indirectly to facilitate the carrying on the business. The above test in Atherton's case, (supra

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. KSK ENERGY COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of revenue are allowed

ITA 1745/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Hyderabad
30 Aug 2021
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt. Nivedita Biswas
Section 143(3)

House of Lords that in order to claim a deduction, it is enough to show that the money is expended, not of necessity and with a view to direct and immediate benefit, but voluntarily and on grounds of commercial expediency and in order to indirectly to facilitate the carrying on the business. The above test in Atherton's case, (supra

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)., HYDERABAD vs. KSK ENERGY COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED., HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of revenue are allowed

ITA 1120/HYD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt. Nivedita Biswas
Section 143(3)

House of Lords that in order to claim a deduction, it is enough to show that the money is expended, not of necessity and with a view to direct and immediate benefit, but voluntarily and on grounds of commercial expediency and in order to indirectly to facilitate the carrying on the business. The above test in Atherton's case, (supra

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)., HYDERABAD vs. KSK ENERGY COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of revenue are allowed

ITA 1121/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt. Nivedita Biswas
Section 143(3)

House of Lords that in order to claim a deduction, it is enough to show that the money is expended, not of necessity and with a view to direct and immediate benefit, but voluntarily and on grounds of commercial expediency and in order to indirectly to facilitate the carrying on the business. The above test in Atherton's case, (supra

KOLORS HEALTHCARE LLP,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 941/HYD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Ms.K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 44A

Section 44AA of the Act and that it\nis duly audited by a Chartered Accountant wherein no discrepancies are\nfound.\n4.4 The Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the receipts through\ncards as per the books of account are more than those through cards as\nper the data retrieved from the cloud storage and digital evidence which\nfact

KOLORS HEALTHCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 935/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Ms.K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 44A

Section 44AA of the Act and that it\nis duly audited by a Chartered Accountant wherein no discrepancies are\nfound.\n4.4\nThe Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the receipts through\ncards as per the books of account are more than those through cards as\nper the data retrieved from the cloud storage and digital evidence which\nfact

KOLORS HEALTHCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 933/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Ms.K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 44A

Section 44AA of the Act and that it\nis duly audited by a Chartered Accountant wherein no discrepancies are\nfound.\n4.4 The Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the receipts through\ncards as per the books of account are more than those through cards as\nper the data retrieved from the cloud storage and digital evidence which\nfact

KOLORS HEALTHCARE LLP,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 938/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Ms.K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 44A

Section 44AA of the Act and that it\nis duly audited by a Chartered Accountant wherein no discrepancies are\nfound.\n4.4 The Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the receipts through\ncards as per the books of account are more than those through cards as\nper the data retrieved from the cloud storage and digital evidence which\nfact

KOLORS HEALTHCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 934/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND\nSHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Ms.K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 44A

Section 44AA of the Act and that it\nis duly audited by a Chartered Accountant wherein no discrepancies are\nfound.\n4.4 The Ld. CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that the receipts through\ncards as per the books of account are more than those through cards as\nper the data retrieved from the cloud storage and digital evidence which\nfact