BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 244Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai80Delhi47Jaipur26Bangalore25Karnataka21Ahmedabad16Chandigarh9Kolkata6Visakhapatnam5Indore4Hyderabad2Raipur2Rajkot2SC2Pune1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 548Section 201(1)4Section 1954Section 143(3)2Section 50C2Section 139(1)2Section 2012Capital Gains2House Property2

ADIT(IT)-I,, HYDERABAD vs. M/S KAMINENI HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 1001/HYD/2013[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Jun 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2012-13 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Kamineni Hospitals Income Tax-1, (International Pvt Ltd., Transaction), L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan: Aaack 8356 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri A. Srinivas Revenue By: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 31/01/2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 25/06/2020

For Appellant: Sri A. SrinivasFor Respondent: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR
Section 191Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 54

house property using the above sale consideration. We have also been informed that they have deposited the entire sale consideration in the Long- Term Capital Gains Account Scheme with Andhra Bank MLA’s colony Branch, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad and also claimed exemption U/s. 54 in the return filed for the AY 2012-13. We are herewith enclosing

Deduction2

KAMLESH RANKA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTL. TAXATION-II, , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1597/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2012-13 Kamlesh Ranka, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Intl. Taxation-Ii, Pan: Acbpr 3953 N Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri D. Satyanarayana Revenue By: Sri Nilanjan Dey Date Of Hearing: 22/07/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 12/09/2019

For Appellant: Sri D. SatyanarayanaFor Respondent: Sri Nilanjan Dey
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 3Section 50Section 50CSection 54

properties only Rs.53,11,153/- before filing of the Return of Income U/s.139(l) for the assessment year 2012-13 i.e. on or before 31.7.20l2. It is seen that the assessee has not complied with the provisions of Section 54(2) of the I.T. Act. The unutilised capital gain is not deposited in the Capital Gains Ale., before furnishing