BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai60Delhi59Raipur17Ahmedabad14Kolkata8Bangalore5Hyderabad4Jaipur2Visakhapatnam2Pune1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 143(3)3Section 194I3Section 2633TDS3Addition to Income3Section 69A2Section 143(1)2Section 2502Section 24

GOWRI SHANKAR GUPTA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 514/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 May 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Sashank Dundu, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.Praveen, DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 294Section 69A

section 294 of the Act. 11. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing, appellant prays that the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to delete the arbitrary additions made and upheld by the lower authorities. 3. Succinctly stated, the assessee had e-filed his return of income for the A.Y.2017-18 on 24.07.2017, declaring

TIRUMALA ESTATES,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 143/HYD/2024[2022-23]Status: Disposed
2
House Property2
Deduction2
ITAT Hyderabad
30 Jul 2025
AY 2022-23

Bench: Us:

Section 143(1)Section 194I

194I of the IT Act, claiming the same as refund. 3. The learned Commissioner ought to have appreciated that the income from the rent is being assessed in the hands of partners as per the orders of the Hon’ble ITAT, whereas, the tax is being deducted in the name of firm, therefore, denying refund in the hands of firm

NAFEES SULTANA,HYEDERABAD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(1), HYDERABAD.

ITA 642/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: Shri K. Sai Prasad. C.AFor Respondent: Dr.Sachin Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 148Section 194ISection 250Section 250(2)Section 25B

Section 25B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which allows deduction of 30% from arrears of rent received before taxing the same as income under the head "Income from House Property". 5. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is not justified in deciding the appeal without condoning the delay thereby depriving the appellant to avail the benefits available

SOUTHERN REALTORS & TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 607/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanm/S. Southern Realtors & Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Towers Private Limited Tax, Circle 3 (2) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aajcs1895B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194ISection 23Section 24Section 263

house property and income from other sources, filed its return of income for the A.Y 2013-14 on 29.09.2013 declaring an income of Rs.1,81,67,710/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act after making an addition of Rs.2,22,750 to the returned income. Subsequently, the CIT perused the assessment records by invoking the provisions