BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “house property”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi65Mumbai62Bangalore28Raipur19Ahmedabad16Jaipur9Hyderabad9Cuttack7Rajkot6Chennai6Lucknow5Indore5Surat3Kolkata3Nagpur3Pune3SC2Patna1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 80I32Section 153C12Addition to Income9Search & Seizure8Section 1327Section 143(3)6Deduction5Disallowance5Section 143(2)4

CELESTIAL AVENUES PVT LTD REP. BY CSK PROPERTIES PVT LTD ON MERGER-PAN-AADCC3990R,HYDERABAD. vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(2), HYDERABAD.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 212/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Hyderabad01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha G, Hon’Bleआ.अपी.सं / Ita Nos.212 To 214/Hyd/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Years: 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09) M/S. Sabir, Sew & The Deputy Commissioner Of Prasad, Jv, Vs. Income Tax, Hyderabad. Circle – 6(1), Hyderabad. Pan : Abcfs2425A अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Srinath Sadanala, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 801ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

194C is applicable to payments made by broadcasting and telecasting companies (including production of programs for broadcasting or telecasting) to advertising agencies and payments by advertising agencies to media owners (such as Doordarshan, newspapers, etc.) and it can not be extended the activities of the assessee. 14. It was submitted that after the issuance of the circular

Section 153A4
Undisclosed Income4
Section 801A2

SABIR, SEW 7 PRASAD JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 214/HYD/2019[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2008-2009
For Appellant: \nShri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: \nShri Srinath Sadanala, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 80I

house property', the assessee was eligible for\nclaiming deduction u/s.80IA(4)(iii) of the Act as ‘business income', for the\nreason that the assessee was merely engaged in developing and\nmaintaining infrastructural facilities which arose out of a project\napproved by the Government of India as an eligible project for claiming\ndeduction u/s.80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. Further

SABIR, SEW & PRASAD JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 213/HYD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2007-08
For Appellant: \nShri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: \nShri Srinath Sadanala, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 80I

house property', the assessee was eligible for\nclaiming deduction u/s.80IA(4)(iii) of the Act as ‘business income', for the\nreason that the assessee was merely engaged in developing and\nmaintaining infrastructural facilities which arose out of a project\napproved by the Government of India as an eligible project for claiming\ndeduction u/s.80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. Further

SABIR , SEW & PRASAD JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 212/HYD/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2006-07
For Appellant: \nShri A. Srinivas, C.AFor Respondent: \nShri Srinath Sadanala, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 801ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

194C is applicable to\npayments made by broadcasting and telecasting companies\n(including production of programs for broadcasting or telecasting)\nto advertising agencies and payments by advertising agencies to\nmedia owners (such as Doordarshan, newspapers, etc.) and it can\nnot be extended the activities of the assessee.\n14. It was submitted that after the issuance of the circular, the\nAct

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

ITA 1851/HYD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Aug 2025AY 2007-08
For Appellant: CA, P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Gurpreet Singh, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 153A

house property and also explained the\nsource out of funds received from HUF and amount paid by\nhis wife and mother. However, could not file any evidence to\njustify his case. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has made\nthe addition towards unexplained investment in house\nproperty and the learned CIT(A) after considering the\nrelevant facts, has rightly sustained the addition

PRATHIMA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 451/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. Hon’Ble & Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Bleassessment Year – 2017-18 Prathima Infrastructure Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Filmnagar, Central Circle – 2(4), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aabcp2098P. (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessee By: Shri K.C.Devdas, Ca Revenue By: Shri B. Bala Krishna, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.11.2024

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, CAFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 80I

property developer. The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y 2017-18 on 31-10-2017, declaring total income of Rs. 15,22,62,650/-, after claiming deduction under Section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 51,05,42,952/-. The case was selected for scrutiny, and during the course of assessment proceedings

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

ITA 1846/HYD/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Aug 2025AY 2005-06
For Appellant: CA, P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Gurpreet Singh, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

house property for\nRs.9,08,650/-\n41. During the course of search proceeding, it is\nnoticed that, Mr. Krishna Chandra, son of the assessee had\nmade an investment for purchase of residential Flat-404, 5th\nFloor, Subhalaxmi Apartments, Green Hills Colony,\nKothapet, Hyderabad in January 2005. The assessee was\nasked to clarify the source for such investment and in\nresponse

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

ITA 1850/HYD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Aug 2025AY 2009-10
For Appellant: CA, P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Gurpreet Singh, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

house property for\nRs.9,08,650/-.\n41.\nDuring the course of search proceeding, it is\nnoticed that, Mr. Krishna Chandra, son of the assessee had\nmade an investment for purchase of residential Flat-404, 5th\nFloor, Subhalaxmi Apartments, Green Hills Colony,\nKothapet, Hyderabad in January 2005. The assessee was\nasked to clarify the source for such investment and in\nresponse

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal ITA

ITA 1847/HYD/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Aug 2025AY 2006-07
For Appellant: CA, P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Gurpreet Singh, Sr. AR
Section 147Section 153A

house property for\nRs.9,08,650/-\n41.\nDuring the course of search proceeding, it is\nnoticed that, Mr. Krishna Chandra, son of the assessee had\nmade an investment for purchase of residential Flat-404, 5th\nFloor, Subhalaxmi Apartments, Green Hills Colony,\nKothapet, Hyderabad in January 2005. The assessee was\nasked to clarify the source for such investment and in\nresponse