CO-OPERATIVE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SOCIETY LTD.,,SIRICILLA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, KARIMNAGAR

Bench: Us:

disallowed the assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Elaborating on his contention, the Ld. AR submitted

CO-OPERATIVE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SOCIETY LTD.,KARIMNAGAR vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, KARIMNAGAR

Bench: Us:

disallowed the assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. Elaborating on his contention, the Ld. AR submitted

SREE KANYAKA MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OP THRIFT CREDIT AND MARKETG. SOCIETY LIMITED,HINDUPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, HINDUPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

disallowing the deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.” 9. With regards to the second contention, the Ld. AR submitted that, if the first contention is not acceptable, then the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 57 of the Act. The ld. AR also submitted that, in support of their claim the assessee rely

ANANTAPUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE STAFF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,ANANTAPUR vs. ITO., WARD-1, ANANTAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.आआआ.आआ /Ita No.1142/Hyd/2024 (आआआआआआआआ आआआआ/Assessment Year:2016-17) M/S. Anantapur District Co- Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-1, Anantapur. Operative Staff Co-Operative Society Limited, Anantapur. Pan:Aaeaa0133B (Appellant) (Respondent) आआआआआआआआआआ आआआआआआ/Assessee Dr. D. Harish Chandra Rama, Ca By: आआआआआआ आआआआआआ/Revenue By: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr-Dr आआआआआआ आआ आआआआआ/Date Of 24/02/2025 Hearing: आआआआआ आआ 04/03/2025 आआआआआ/Pronouncement: आआआआ/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By M/S. Anantapur District Co-Operative Staff Co-Operative Society Limited (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi (“Ld. Cit(A)”), Dated 05.09.2024 For The A.Y. 2016-17. 2. The Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Association Of Persons (“Aop”), Not Filed Any Return Of Income (“Roi”) U/S.139 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ('The Act'). From The Information

2)(d) of the Act was disallowed through intimation under section 143(1) of the Act and the rectification application filed by the assessee under section 154 of the Act was rejected. Appeal filed against the order under section 154 of the Act was also rejected on the ground that the disallowance under section 80P

DURGAMATHA HOUSE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaassessment Year: 2020-21 Durgamatha House Building Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-11(1), Construction Co-Operative Hyderabad. Housing Society Limited, Hyderabad. Pan : Aacad6852C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri T. Chaitanya Kumar, Advocate Revenue By: Ms. Kavitha Rani, Sr-Dr Date Of Hearing: 03.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.12.2024

2)(d) of the Act was disallowed through intimation under section 143(1) of the Act and the rectification application filed by the assessee under section 154 of the Act was rejected. Appeal filed against the order under section 154 of the Act was also rejected on the ground that the disallowance under section 80P

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. THE ADVOCATES MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.636/Hyd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. The Advocates Mutually Income Tax, Circle 9(1) Aided Cooperative Hyderabad Society Ltd, Hyderabad Pan:Aaaat7853P (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri A Srinivas, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Shiva Sewak, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 15/05/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 15/05/2024 आदेश/Order

disallowed deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The solitary issue contested by the Revenue is against deduction allowed u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income earned by the appellant cooperative society from other cooperative banks. As per the provisions of section

DURGAMATHA HOUSE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD -11(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary

2)(d) of the Act was disallowed through intimation under section 143(1) of the Act and the rectification application filed by the assessee under section 154 of the Act was rejected. Appeal filed against the order under section 154 of the Act was also rejected on the Page 3 of 6 ground that the disallowance under section 80P

ACIT., CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. RANGAREDDY DIST JUDL EMPLOYEE MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

Bench: Us:

Section 143(2) of the Act. 5. During the course of the assessment proceedings, it was observed by the A.O. that the assessee society had raised a double facet claim for deduction u/s 80P of the Act, viz., (i). U/s 80P(2)(a)(i): Rs.1,04,92,276/-; and (ii). U/s 80P(2)(d): Rs.1

FEDERATION OF AP COOPERATIVE URBAN BANKS AND CREDIT SOCIETIES LIMITED HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.464/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Federation Of Ap Vs. Income Tax Officer Cooperative Urban Banks Ward 9(1) & Credit Societies Ltd. Hyderabad Hyd, Hyderabad Pan:Aaaaf7350F (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri S. Rama Rao, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri V. Ravish Bhatt, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 29/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/11/2025

D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.464/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Federation of AP Vs. Income Tax Officer Cooperative Urban Banks Ward 9(1) and Credit Societies Ltd. Hyderabad Hyd, Hyderabad PAN:AAAAF7350F (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee by: Shri S. Rama Rao, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue by:: Shri V. Ravish

SANGHI TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERBAD vs. ITO., WARD-3(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Us:

disallowance of Rs. 94,55,889/- are upheld and sustained. Accordingly. relevant grounds of appeal are dismissed and not allowed. 6. In result, the present appeal of the appellant is dismissed and not allowed.” 12. The assessee company, being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A), has carried the matter in appeal before us. 13. We have heard

THE GHATKESAR FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,MEDCHAL vs. ITO., WARD-15(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary

disallowance. 4. Submission of the learned AR is that the assessee is a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society as is evident from the registration of the society, funds deposited are the own funds of the assessee, namely, the surplus funds which are not to be utilised in the near future in the nationalised bank and, therefore, such deposit has nexus with

UOH STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Us:

disallowance of deduction u/s. 80P by CPC ws. 143(1)(a) of the Act. 3. The Learned CIT(A) erred in Law and Facts in deciding the allowance of deduction w's. 80P towards the Interest Earned from Term Deposits made out of Statutory Reserves of the Society with Scheduled Public Sector Banks. 4.The Learned CIT(A) erred in evaluation

STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act in respect of the interest income amounting to Rs 90,31,838/-. learned Assessing Officer, however, disallowed the same by order passed under section 143(3) of the Act on the ground that the assessee is a co-operative bank. Page 2 of 8 4. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred appeal

THE INDUR INTIDEEPAM PRODUCERS MA CO-OP SOCIETIES FEDERATION LIMITED,NIZAMABAD vs. ITO WARD-1, NIZAMABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

disallow the deduction claimed by the assessee in return of income which is directly relatable to the insurance activities, as it do not fall under section 80P(2) of the Act i.e., Insurance activities. Accordingly, we remand back the matter to the file of Assessing Officer for the limited purposes of verifying the deduction claimed in return of income

ANDHRA PRAGATHI FARMERS SERVICE CO-OP SOCIETY ,RAMADURGAM vs. ITO, WARD-1, ADONI

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

disallowing the assessees' section 80P(2)(d) deduction claims in issue qua the respective interest income derived form fixed deposit

PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED MINARPALLY,MINARPALLY VILLAGE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NIZAMABAD

disallowing the claim of\ndeduction of Rs 6,45,461 U/s 80P of the Act\n2. The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the amended\nprovisions of Section 80P are not applicable to the assessment\nyear\n3. The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the delay in filing\nthe return was due to the delay

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

80P;] ITA Nos.1796/Hyd/2017, 241/Hyd/2018 Page 20 & 460 to 464/Hyd/2023 (S.A. Nos.63 to 67/Hyd/2023) (2) In making any deduction for a bad debt or part thereof, the following provisions shall apply— [(i) no such deduction shall be allowed unless such debt or part thereof has been taken into account in computing the income of the assessee of the previous year

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

80P;] ITA Nos.1796/Hyd/2017, 241/Hyd/2018 Page 20 & 460 to 464/Hyd/2023 (S.A. Nos.63 to 67/Hyd/2023) (2) In making any deduction for a bad debt or part thereof, the following provisions shall apply— [(i) no such deduction shall be allowed unless such debt or part thereof has been taken into account in computing the income of the assessee of the previous year