BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80P(2)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai425Bangalore218Pune140Chennai127Cochin98Panaji66Visakhapatnam62Delhi62Kolkata61Nagpur56Ahmedabad47Jaipur45Raipur35Rajkot33Surat32Hyderabad28Lucknow27Indore27Chandigarh22Jodhpur15Amritsar7Varanasi6SC4Jabalpur3Dehradun2Patna1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(vii)27Section 80P(2)(a)26Section 36(1)(viii)26Deduction25Section 80P22Section 36(1)(viia)19Addition to Income19Section 143(3)17Disallowance

ACIT., CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. RANGAREDDY DIST JUDL EMPLOYEE MUTUALLY AIDED CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

ITA 1269/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Apr 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowance\nmade by the A.O. u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Grounds of\nappeal Nos.2 & 3 raised by the revenue are dismissed in terms\nof our aforesaid observations.\n16. Apropos the declining of the assessee's claim for deduction of\nthe interest income earned from investments made with Co-\noperative Banks u/s 80P(2

UOH STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

14
Section 143(1)13
Section 80P(2)(d)11
Depreciation9
ITA 469/HYD/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed
ITAT Hyderabad
21 Jan 2026
AY 2021-2022

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A). Before the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has reiterated its arguments made before the A.O. and claimed that interest earned from fixed deposit with the nationalized banks is also eligible for claiming deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) or Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act because the interest received is forming part of business of the assessee and therefore the same cannot be disallowed under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A), after considering the submissions of the

For Appellant: Shri K. Saikiran, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. P. Sumitha. Sr. A.R
Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed the interest income and added the same under Section 80P(2) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A), after considering the relevant facts, has 9 UOH Staff Cooperative Credit Society Limited rightly set aside the issue to the file of the A.O. to verify the facts with regard to the interest earned by the assessee and to decide

SREE KANYAKA MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OP THRIFT CREDIT AND MARKETG. SOCIETY LIMITED,HINDUPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, HINDUPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 224/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri D. Shree Raksha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR
Section 143(3)Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance is covered under para no. 5 to 10 of his order, which is reproduced as under : 5. In response to this, the assessee has submitted his reply and stated the facts of the case. The assessee has stated that assessee’s society is not doing any banking business except accepting deposits from its own members and advancing loans

CO-OPERATIVE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SOCIETY LTD.,KARIMNAGAR vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, KARIMNAGAR

ITA 478/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Us:

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(va)

C. Green Cooperative Housing and Society Ltd. Vs. ITO-21(3)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 1343/Mum/2017, dated 31.03.2017 (iii) Marvwanjee Cama Park Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. ITO- Range-20(2)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 6139/Mum/2014, dated 27.09.2017. (iv). Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Pemises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. ITO, 21(2)(1), Mumbai We further find that

CO-OPERATIVE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SOCIETY LTD.,,SIRICILLA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1, KARIMNAGAR

ITA 411/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Us:

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(va)

C. Green Cooperative Housing and Society Ltd. Vs. ITO-21(3)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 1343/Mum/2017, dated 31.03.2017 (iii) Marvwanjee Cama Park Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. ITO- Range-20(2)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 6139/Mum/2014, dated 27.09.2017. (iv). Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Pemises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. ITO, 21(2)(1), Mumbai We further find that

FEDERATION OF AP COOPERATIVE URBAN BANKS AND CREDIT SOCIETIES LIMITED HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-9(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 464/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.464/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Federation Of Ap Vs. Income Tax Officer Cooperative Urban Banks Ward 9(1) & Credit Societies Ltd. Hyderabad Hyd, Hyderabad Pan:Aaaaf7350F (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri S. Rama Rao, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri V. Ravish Bhatt, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 29/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/11/2025

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri V. Ravish Bhatt, Sr. DR

C— Deductions in respect of certain incomes”, which thereby brought Section 80P of the Act within its fold. In the present case, the assessment year involved is 2019–20; therefore, the amended provision would not apply retrospectively. Hence, the CPC had no Page 8 of 11 ITA No 464 of 2025 Federation of AP Coop Urban Banks and Credit Societies

THE GHATKESAR FARMERS SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,MEDCHAL vs. ITO., WARD-15(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri T. Chaitanya Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Shri A. Arun &
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance. 4. Submission of the learned AR is that the assessee is a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society as is evident from the registration of the society, funds deposited are the own funds of the assessee, namely, the surplus funds which are not to be utilised in the near future in the nationalised bank and, therefore, such deposit has nexus with

THE INDUR INTIDEEPAM PRODUCERS MA CO-OP SOCIETIES FEDERATION LIMITED,NIZAMABAD vs. ITO WARD-1, NIZAMABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 339/HYD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramarao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahmed, Sr. A.R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

disallowed the receipt instead of the income earned by the assessee on the said amount. Therefore, the order passed by the ld.CIT(A) is not in accordance with the law. 9. Per contra, the ld.DR has submitted that the assessee has been earning income from the activities which are not fallen within the purview of section 80P

STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 667/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shakeer Ahamed, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed the same by order passed under section 143(3) of the Act on the ground that the assessee is a co-operative bank. Page 2 of 8 4. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A). Learned CIT(A) on reappraisal of the facts found that the assessee is a co-operative society

ACIT., CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. RANGAREDDY DIST JUDL EMPLOYEE MUTUALLY AIDED COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

ITA 1264/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowed. 9. Aggrieved, the assessee society carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who found favor with its contentions and u/s 80P of the Act as well as interest paid on share capital. For the sake of clarity, the observations of the CIT(A) are culled out as under: ITA Nos.1264 and 1269/Hyd/2024 ITA Nos.1264 and 1269/Hyd/2024

UNION BANK OF INDIA (ERSTWHILE-ANDHRA BANK),MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 193/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri S. Ananthan, C.A. &For Respondent: Ms. M Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 36(1)(vila)

C. J. I.— have gone through the judgment of my esteemed brother, Swatanter Kumar J. and I agree with the conclusions contained therein. However, I would like to give my own reasons. The question for our consideration is - whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessee(s) is eligible for deduction of the bad and doubtful debts

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1796/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 241/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 463/HYD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 462/HYD/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 460/HYD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 464/HYD/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the S.As. filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 461/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Anil Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), which is not a scheduled bank;] [( ia)] "rural branch" means a branch of a scheduled bank 13[or a non-scheduled bank] situated in a place which has a population of not more than ten thousand according to the last preceding census of which the relevant figures

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of revenue is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 316/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Apr 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri S. Ananthan, C.A. &For Respondent: Ms. M Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 36(1)(vila)

C. J. I. — have gone through the judgment of my esteemed brother,\nSwatanter Kumar J. and I agree with the conclusions contained therein. However, I\nwould like to give my own reasons.\nThe question for our consideration is - whether, on the facts and circumstances of the\ncase, the assessee(s) is eligible for deduction of the bad and doubtful debts

UOH STAFF COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 468/HYD/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Aug 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: Shri. Sai Kiran, CAFor Respondent: Shri Gurpreet Singh. Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 80PSection 80P(2)(d)

section 143(1)(a). In the result, we see no infirmity in the judgment of the High Court. The appeals are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.” 14. We thus, are of a firm conviction, that as the disallowance by the A.O of the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s 80P