Search: disallowance

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai96 Delhi31 Kolkata13 Bangalore11 Ahmedabad9 Surat7 Pune7 Raipur6 Chandigarh4 Jaipur3 Lucknow3 Rajkot3 Chennai3 Hyderabad2 Indore1 SC1 Nagpur1 Karnataka1

N PADMAJA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

Appeal are dismissed

ITA 2248/HYD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Apr 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu(Through Physical Hearing) Smt. Nandamuri Padmaja Devi, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Ramakrishna 70 Mm, Of Income Tax, Ntr Estates, Abids, Circle 2(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad-500 001 Pan Aaxpn 3203B Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri G.Kalyan Das & Shri A. harishFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Majumdar (D.R.)

Section 143(3)Section 254

Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). 2 Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. The assessee has raised the following substantive grounds in the instant appeal : “ 1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is contrary to law and the facts. 2. Authorities below erred in not accepting Capital Gains

N PADMAJA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

MOHD. ABDUL HAMEED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3), HYDERABAD

N PADMAJA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

MOHD. ABDUL HAMEED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3), HYDERABAD