DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Dbs Technology Income Tax, Services India Private Circle – 8(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.2/Hyd/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Dbs Technology Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Circle – 8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Cross Objector / (Appellant/Revenue) Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm: The Appeal & Cross-Objection Filed By The Revenue For A.Y. 2019-20 Arise From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi

disallowance, and also in a case where NO response is received, then within thirty days of the issue of such intimation, department is free to make such adjustment. 8. On going through the above intimation made under section 143(1), CPC has not followed the above provisos by giving proper opportunity to the assessee to defend its case

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

section 132(4A) and 292C of the Act, document or material should be found in the possession of a person who is searched or his associate or an employee. If any document is found in the possession of a 3rd person during the course of search, then said document can be considered for assessment of that person or any other

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SRI ADITYA HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result the appeal I

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

4A) read with section 292C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is not applicable is devoid of merits. The Assessing Officer and the learned CIT(A), after considering the relevant facts, has rightly made addition and thus, the order of the learned CIT(A) should be sustained. 12 ITA.Nos.262 to 268/Hyd./2025, ITA.No.98/Hyd./2025 And C.O.Nos

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

4A) of the Act and observed that, the assessee has failed to offer any explanation with regard to credits appearing in the bank account of employees and thus, quantified the amount of Rs.1,30,94,500/- and made addition as unexplained cash credits of the assessee. The relevant findings of the Assessing Officer are as under: 33 ITA.Nos

ANDHRA PRADESH BEVERAGES CORPORATION LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

disallowance of same u/s.40a(iib). Further, it is stated that there is no exclusive levy of privilege fee on APBCL to attract provisions of section 40a(iib). In support of this contention, APBCL has filed letter issued by Commissioner Excise & Prohibition as additional evidence. Hon'ble ITAT has set aside the issue to the file of AO with a direction

TELANGANA WORKING JOURNALISTS WELFARE FUND,HYDERABAD vs. ITO,(EXEMPTIONS),WARD-3, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyassessment Year: 2020-21 Telangana Working Vs. Ito(Exemptions), Ward-3 Journalists Welfare Fund Aaykar Bhawan 5-9-166, Chappel Road L.B.Stadium Road Nampally Hyderabad-500 004 Hyderabad Telangana-500 001

4A) along with audit report in form 10B declaring ‘nil’ total income. An intimation u/s. 143(1), dated 24.12.2021 was issued to the assessee determining the total income at Rs.24,51,44,792/- and determining the tax liability, Fees and interest at Rs. 12,83,26,572/- after denying the benefit of section 11 and section 12 to the assessee

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

disallowing the claim of 80IA as the assessee was not the owner of the infrastructural facilities laid / installed / created by it. In fact, the owner of the said infrastructural facilities were the Superintendent Engineer / Chief Engineer / Project Director of the concerned Government Department. He drew our attention to pages 3 to 5 of the assessment order and had also drawn

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

disallowing the claim of 80IA as the assessee was not the owner of the infrastructural facilities laid / installed / created by it. In fact, the owner of the said infrastructural facilities were the Superintendent Engineer / Chief Engineer / Project Director of the concerned Government Department. He drew our attention to pages 3 to 5 of the assessment order and had also drawn