BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi29Kolkata12Mumbai11Bangalore6Ahmedabad6Jaipur5Chennai4Surat3Hyderabad2Raipur2Cochin1Pune1Rajkot1Karnataka1Chandigarh1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 115B6Section 69A4Section 132A2Section 1312Section 153A2Business Income2Unexplained Money2Addition to Income2

BAL REDDY KANDUNURI,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1202/HYD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jan 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: \nShri A.V. Raghuram, ARFor Respondent: \nDr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 115BSection 131Section 132ASection 153ASection 69A

40b(v). In this regard, our reference was drawn to the decision of Co- ordinate\nBench in case of Shri Ramnarayan Birla (in ITA No. 482/JP/15 dted 30.09.2016). In\nthat case, the question before the Coordinate Bench was \"whether the CIT(A)-2,\nUdaipur has erred in directing the AO to assess the unexplained investment\nsurrendered by the assessee under

BAL REDDY KANDUNURI,ADILABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1203/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri G. Manjunatha & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Raghuram, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 115BSection 131Section 132ASection 153ASection 69A

40b(v). In this regard, our reference was drawn to the decision of Co- ordinate Bench in case of Shri Ramnarayan Birla (in ITA No. 482/JP/15 dted 30.09.2016). In that case, the question before the Coordinate Bench was "whether the CIT(A)-2, Udaipur has erred in directing the AO to assess the unexplained investment surrendered by the assessee under