Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai20 Kolkata14 Delhi14 Ranchi13 Hyderabad12 Jaipur11 Chennai10 Bangalore8 Lucknow4 Ahmedabad4 SC3 Indore3 Pune1 Cochin1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)21 Addition to Income12 Section 43B9 Section 35E9 Deduction9 Depreciation9 TDS9 Disallowance9 Section 143(2)3 Penalty

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM vs. M/S SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LTD.,, KHAMMAM DIST

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 801/HYD/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM vs. THE SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LT.D, KOTHAGUDEM, KOTHAGUDEM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

3

ITA 519/HYD/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM vs. M/S SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LTD.,, KHAMMAM DIST

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 802/HYD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM vs. M/S SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LTD.,, KHAMMAM DIST

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 803/HYD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 879/HYD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 880/HYD/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 882/HYD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 884/HYD/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

THE SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANY LTD., KOTHJAGUDEM,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CITT, KHAMMAM RANGE, KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2009-10 & 2010-11 are dismissed

ITA 561/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 May 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahusl.

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Anjala Sahu &

Section 143(3)Section 35ESection 43B

section 35E, the AO computed the disallowance u/s 35E to the tune of Rs. 3,49,19,111/- by observing

THE ANDHRA PRADESH MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD., HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(3), HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 328/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Jul 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri C.S. SubramanyamFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 35E of the Act, the AO asked the assessee to show cause as to why the said expenditure should not be allowed only to the extent of 1/10th of Rs. 1,18,48,159/-. 10.1 In response, the assessee inter-alia, stated that the expenditure is regular and routine for the assessee company as it was in the business

ACIT, CIRLCE-2(2), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. THE ANDHRA PRADESH MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 335/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Jul 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri C.S. SubramanyamFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 35E of the Act, the AO asked the assessee to show cause as to why the said expenditure should not be allowed only to the extent of 1/10th of Rs. 1,18,48,159/-. 10.1 In response, the assessee inter-alia, stated that the expenditure is regular and routine for the assessee company as it was in the business

THE ANDHRA PRADESH MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 1790/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Jul 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri C.S. SubramanyamFor Respondent: Shri P. Chandra Sekhar

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 35E of the Act, the AO asked the assessee to show cause as to why the said expenditure should not be allowed only to the extent of 1/10th of Rs. 1,18,48,159/-. 10.1 In response, the assessee inter-alia, stated that the expenditure is regular and routine for the assessee company as it was in the business