SUDHEER PARIMALA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 758/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Apr 2026AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.758/Hyd./2025 Assessment Year 2015-2016 Sudheer Parimala, The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad – 500 016. Vs. Ward-10(1), Hyderabad. Pan Ahppp7572E Pin - 500 004. Telangana (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Ca Kranthi Palivela & Ca Mrudulatha For Revenue : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Ar Date Of Hearing : 24.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.04.2026 आदेश/Order
For Appellant: CA Kranthi Palivela And CA MrudulathaFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 69A
271F;
And grant such other relief(s) as may be deemed fit in the interest of justice.”
3. The assessee also raised the following additional grounds of appeal:
1. “On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Income
Tax Officer, Ward 10(1), Hyderabad ('Ld. AO") erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 147/148 after the expiry
