RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

disallowed on a technical reason of delay in\nfiling of the Audit Report in Form No. 10B, which is due to\na reasonable cause and the same is beyond the control of\nthe appellant.\n4.\nThe Ld. CIT(A) has erred in observing that the appellant\nhas not given any reasonable cause for delay in filing the\nappeal by over

RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, three appeals i

disallowed on a technical reason of delay in\nfiling of the Audit Report in Form No. 10B, which is due to\na reasonable cause and the same is beyond the control of\nthe appellant.\nThe Ld. CIT(A) has erred in observing that the appellant\nhas not given any reasonable cause for delay in filing the\nappeal by over

PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,KARIMNAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-2, KARIMANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

271B as the assessee is a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society consisting of Self Help Groups as members on mutuality basis. 3. Similar grounds were raised by the assessee in other appeal also i.e., ITA 142/Hyd/2023 for A.Ys. 2017-18 except the amounts involved. 4. Before us, ld. DR submitted that the issues raised in both the appeals are identical

PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,KARIMNAGAR vs. ITO,WARD-2, KARIMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

271B as the assessee is a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society consisting of Self Help Groups as members on mutuality basis. 3. Similar grounds were raised by the assessee in other appeal also i.e., ITA 142/Hyd/2023 for A.Ys. 2017-18 except the amounts involved. 4. Before us, ld. DR submitted that the issues raised in both the appeals are identical

KONATHAM KOTIREDDY,WARANGAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, WARANGAL

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

disallowance of deduction u/sec. 80C were also deleted as they were beyond the scope of limited scrutiny.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "69A", "143(3)", "145(3)", "271B

SANGHI TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

disallowed i.e. Rs.94,55,889/- and added to the returned income of the appellant-company. Thus, the Assessing Officer determined the total income of the appellant-company at Rs.1,40,65,678/- under section 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act. 2.1. The Assessing Officer further noted that the appellant-company has not furnished tax audit report in Form