BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore108Raipur15Delhi12Chennai10Mumbai7Jaipur6Hyderabad5Bangalore4Kolkata4Lucknow2Jodhpur2Karnataka1Pune1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 15421Section 115J17Section 10A12Section 359Section 143(3)7Section 35(1)(i)6Limitation/Time-bar5Section 1564Section 143(1)3

KANTAR GDC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE - 2(1), HYDERABAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 274/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Kumar Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 156

200A or sub-section (1) of section 206CB, the intimation under those sub-sections shall be deemed to be a notice of demand for the purposes of this section. (2) Where the income of the assessee of any assessment year, beginning on or after the 1st day of April, 2021, includes income of the nature specified in clause

KANTAR GDC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE - 2(1), HYDERABAD

Exemption3
Deduction3
Rectification u/s 1543

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 804/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Kumar Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 156

200A or sub-section (1) of section 206CB, the intimation under those sub-sections shall be deemed to be a notice of demand for the purposes of this section. (2) Where the income of the assessee of any assessment year, beginning on or after the 1st day of April, 2021, includes income of the nature specified in clause

CELESTIAL BIOLABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

ITA 961/HYD/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. RamraoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 35Section 35(1)(i)Section 4

disallowing the deductions claimed under sections 10A, 35(2AB) and 35(I)(i) of the Act. It was held by the Assessing Officer that the assessee was not eligible to claim deduction u/s 10A of the Act and therefore, the assessee on its own withdrew the deduction u/s 10A of the Act and therefore, t claimed in the revised computation

CELESTIAL BIOLABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

ITA 962/HYD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. RamraoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 35Section 35(1)(i)Section 4

disallowing the deductions claimed under sections 10A, 35(2AB) and 35(I)(i) of the Act. It was held by the Assessing Officer that the assessee was not eligible to claim deduction u/s 10A of the Act and therefore, the assessee on its own withdrew the deduction u/s 10A of the Act and therefore, t claimed in the revised computation

CELESTIAL BIOLABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA

ITA 963/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S. RamraoFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 35Section 35(1)(i)Section 4

disallowing the deductions claimed under sections 10A, 35(2AB) and 35(I)(i) of the Act. It was held by the Assessing Officer that the assessee was not eligible to claim deduction u/s 10A of the Act and therefore, the assessee on its own withdrew the deduction u/s 10A of the Act and therefore, t claimed in the revised computation