BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 197Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi39Bangalore15Mumbai10Cochin8Kolkata8Cuttack6Chennai6Jaipur4Hyderabad4Nagpur3Jodhpur2Pune2Lucknow1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)4Section 2014Section 404Section 197A4Deduction4TDS4Disallowance4Survey u/s 133A4

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 8/HYD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 197A. Assessee also submitted that it has placed a system of collecting the forms from rural branches to HO and submitting the same at the time of assessment. Assessee also submitted that in the subsequent assessments, it was properly submitted the forms to Assessing Officer. Considering the above submissions, in our view, assessee is not at default and also

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 10/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 197A. Assessee also submitted that it has placed a system of collecting the forms from rural branches to HO and submitting the same at the time of assessment. Assessee also submitted that in the subsequent assessments, it was properly submitted the forms to Assessing Officer. Considering the above submissions, in our view, assessee is not at default and also

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 11/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 197A. Assessee also submitted that it has placed a system of collecting the forms from rural branches to HO and submitting the same at the time of assessment. Assessee also submitted that in the subsequent assessments, it was properly submitted the forms to Assessing Officer. Considering the above submissions, in our view, assessee is not at default and also

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed in above terms

ITA 9/HYD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev AdityaFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar
Section 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 197A. Assessee also submitted that it has placed a system of collecting the forms from rural branches to HO and submitting the same at the time of assessment. Assessee also submitted that in the subsequent assessments, it was properly submitted the forms to Assessing Officer. Considering the above submissions, in our view, assessee is not at default and also