Search: disallowance

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 197Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi39 Bangalore15 Mumbai10 Cochin8 Kolkata8 Hyderabad6 Chennai6 Cuttack6 Jaipur4 Jodhpur3 Nagpur3 Ahmedabad3 Pune2 Chandigarh1 Surat1 Lucknow1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 408 TDS6 Disallowance6 Section 201(1)4 Section 2014 Section 197A4 Section 194A4 Deduction4 Survey u/s 133A4 Section 148

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. TELANGANA GRAMEENA BANK (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and the assessee’s C

ITA 714/HYD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

For Respondent: Smt. Nivedita Biswas, DR

Section 148Section 194ASection 263Section 40Section 44A

disallowing the expenditure incurred on account of interest on deposits due to non availability of Form 15G/15H ignoring that the branches are in rural areas and more than 100 branches are involved, it had difficulty in collecting the same as date pertains almost prior to 8 years. 3. For these and any other grounds which may be raised

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. TELANGANA GRAMEENA BANK (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK), HYDERABAD

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. TELANGANA GRAMEENA BANK (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK), HYDERABAD

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), HYDERABAD vs. TELANGANA GRAMEENA BANK(EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK), HYDERABAD

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI

SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA BANK,CHITTOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD-1, TIRUPATI