BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi108Mumbai103Kolkata76Bangalore28Ahmedabad22Raipur18Chennai13Cochin11Jaipur10Pune9Visakhapatnam8Cuttack8Chandigarh4Hyderabad4Karnataka4Jodhpur2Indore2Surat2Guwahati1Nagpur1Kerala1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 4012Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4Section 2633Deduction3TDS3Disallowance3Section 143(2)2Section 242

GLOBAL DEVELOPERS,NELLORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, NELLORE

ITA 1683/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1683/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Global Developers, Vs. Dcit, Nellore. Circle-1, Pan: Aagfg8471R Nellore. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: None राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri Sankar Pandi. P, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 28/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 04/02/2026 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi. P, Sr. AR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

section 194I): Rs.1,55,880/-. In our view, as the assessee firm had failed to deposit tax deducted at source (TDS) of Rs.38,57,609/- (supra), therefore, the AO has rightly disallowed

CYIENT LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1250/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2021-22 Cyient Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1 (1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Apn : Aaac14887J

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA and Shri KFor Respondent: Shri L.V. Bhaskara Reddy, CIT-DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 40Section 92C

194I of the Act, where the assessee is required to deduct TDS on the total payments made by the payee but under provisions of Section 192 only, in case payment comes under taxable net, then TDS needs to be deducted. Since the assessee claims that in many of the employees’ cases, the income does not exceed the taxable

ITO, WARD-3(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. SARANYA ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 386/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Feb 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Manmohan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 40

194I 21,97,140 4. Commission 194H 3,01,400 5. Contract amount 194C 43,05,866 83,60,775 Therefore, the A.O. invoked the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act to make an addition of Rs. 83,60,775/-. 3. Aggrieved, assessee contended before the Ld. CIT(A) that no disallowance

SOUTHERN REALTORS & TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 607/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanm/S. Southern Realtors & Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Towers Private Limited Tax, Circle 3 (2) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aajcs1895B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194ISection 23Section 24Section 263

section 263 and observed that there were certain discrepancies which are as follows: “3. On examination of the assessment record, discrepancies are noticed in the following issues: a) As seen from the agreement entered with the tenants, the municipal tax shall be payable by the tenants and as such the claim of municipal tax of Rs.3,57,524 needs