ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. EENADU TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

disallowance under Section 14A and subscription revenue.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "148", "143(3)", "32(1)(ii)", "9A", "9B", "142A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. EENADU TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

disallowance for further examination by the AO.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "148", "143(3)", "32(1)(ii)", "9A", "9B", "142A

MANJU DUDALA,HYDERABAD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeal ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

section 142A of the Act and after considering relevant valuation report submitted by the valuer, the Assessing Officer has allowed the claim of depreciation of non-compete fee. In this regard, he has submitted relevant observations of the Tribunal and also the consequential assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer for the assessment year 2008-2009 dated 19.05.2023 where

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. EENADU TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

section 142A of the Act and after considering\nrelevant valuation report submitted by the valuer, the\nAssessing Officer has allowed the claim of depreciation of\nnon-compete fee. In this regard, he has submitted relevant\nobservations of the Tribunal and also the consequential\nassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer for the\n assessment year 2008-2009 dated 19.05.2023 where

EENADU TELEVISION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

section 142A of the Act and after considering\nrelevant valuation report submitted by the valuer, the\nAssessing Officer has allowed the claim of depreciation of\nnon-compete fee. In this regard, he has submitted relevant\nobservations of the Tribunal and also the consequential\nassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer for the\n assessment year 2008-2009 dated 19.05.2023 where