BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 115Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai163Delhi114Kolkata47Ahmedabad33Chennai13Jaipur11Surat11Bangalore10Pune7Hyderabad5Indore3Karnataka3Guwahati3Nagpur3Cochin2Visakhapatnam2Rajkot2Telangana1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 115J20Section 14A8Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 143(3)3Section 403Section 2633Section 1442

M/S. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD.,,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed &

ITA 1460/HYD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanm/S. Southern Power Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Distribution Company Of Tax, Circle 2(1) Andhra Pradesh Ltd Tirupati Tirupati 517 503 Pan: Aahcs 4056 Q Dy. Commissioner Of Vs M/S. Southern Power Distribution Income Tax, Company Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd Circle 2(1) Tirupati 517 503 Tirupati Pan: Aahcs 4056 Q

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Smt. U. Mini Chandran, DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)

disallowing the expenditure u/s 37 of the Act cannot be adopted for adding the same to the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act as the mode of computation of income under these two provisions entirely different. The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of T.N. Cements (Cited Supra) has considered similar circumstances and has held as under

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), TIRUPATHI vs. M/S. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED,, TIRUPATHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed &

ITA 1533/HYD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmanm/S. Southern Power Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Distribution Company Of Tax, Circle 2(1) Andhra Pradesh Ltd Tirupati Tirupati 517 503 Pan: Aahcs 4056 Q Dy. Commissioner Of Vs M/S. Southern Power Distribution Income Tax, Company Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd Circle 2(1) Tirupati 517 503 Tirupati Pan: Aahcs 4056 Q

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Smt. U. Mini Chandran, DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)

disallowing the expenditure u/s 37 of the Act cannot be adopted for adding the same to the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act as the mode of computation of income under these two provisions entirely different. The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of T.N. Cements (Cited Supra) has considered similar circumstances and has held as under

AGILA SPECIALTIES PRIVATE LIMITED(NOW MERGED WITH MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 987/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Oct 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2012-13 Agila Specialities Private Vs. Acit, Limited, Circle-16(2), (Now Merged With Mylan 2Nd Floor, B-Block, Laboratories Limited) Income Tax Towers, Plot No. 564/A/22, Road Masabtank, No. 92, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad – 004. Hyderabad, Telangana-34. Pan: Aaacq 1091 Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri Sharath Rao Revenue By: Smt. Nivedita Biswas-Dr Date Of Hearing: 03/09/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/10/2019 Order Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Am.:

For Appellant: Sri Sharath RaoFor Respondent: Smt. Nivedita Biswas-DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 14ASection 263Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance U/s. 14A of the Act will not arise. However, in the instant case of the assessee, since we have already deleted the addition made U/s. 14A, increasing the book profit will not arise. Further the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court cited by the assessee in the case Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT [2002] 255 ITR 273/122 Taxman

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD vs. STAR FEATURES INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 445/HYD/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad01 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godaraassessment Year: 2009-10 Dcit, Vs. Star Features Circle-3(2), International Private Hyderabad. Limited, Hyderabad. Pan: Aaccp 3799 G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar Revenue By: Sri T. Sunil Goutam, Sr. Ar Date Of Hearing: 01/12/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 01/02/2022 Order Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Am.:

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Sri T. Sunil Goutam, Sr. AR
Section 115JSection 144Section 250(6)

disallowance of expenditure incurred on account of premium paid for buy-back of shares on the ground that the Assessing Officer does not have the jurisdiction to go behind the net profit shown in the P & L Account except to the explanation to section 115J

SECUNDERABAD HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED ,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1770/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Sri P Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Sri M. Mahidhar, DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 14ASection 201Section 40

disallowed u/s 14A of the I.T. Act, 1961 cannot be added to arrive at book profit for MAT Calculation u/s 115JB of the Act. Page 2 of 3 ITA No 1770 of 2018 Secunderabad Hotels P Ltd Secunderabad 11) The learned CIT (A) erred in not following decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Apollo Tyres