BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

517 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(23)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,823Delhi5,380Bangalore2,057Chennai1,499Kolkata1,459Ahmedabad748Jaipur706Hyderabad517Indore347Pune345Chandigarh344Raipur302Surat220Amritsar184Karnataka156Rajkot143Cochin136Nagpur115Visakhapatnam114Lucknow113Agra79SC64Cuttack61Guwahati59Allahabad58Telangana50Calcutta47Panaji46Jodhpur37Varanasi31Kerala25Dehradun20Patna12Ranchi12Jabalpur7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana3Himachal Pradesh3Orissa2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Gauhati1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)81Addition to Income76Section 153C67Disallowance58Section 80I53Deduction33Section 10A27Section 13225Cash Deposit25Search & Seizure

HYDERABAD METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 271/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya –
Section 11Section 139Section 139(1)

disallowance made by the ld.CIT(A), we are of the opinion that the issue is required to be send back to the file of the Assessing Officer by issuing the similar direction as we have done in the case of Kakatiya Urban Development Authority Vs. ACIT (Exemptions) in ITA Nos.1722 to 1726/Hyd/2022 wherein it was held as under

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE, HYDERABAD vs. HYDERABAD METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SECUNDERABAD

Showing 1–20 of 517 · Page 1 of 26

...
25
Section 153A21
Section 6820

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 326/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya –
Section 11Section 139Section 139(1)

disallowance made by the ld.CIT(A), we are of the opinion that the issue is required to be send back to the file of the Assessing Officer by issuing the similar direction as we have done in the case of Kakatiya Urban Development Authority Vs. ACIT (Exemptions) in ITA Nos.1722 to 1726/Hyd/2022 wherein it was held as under

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONAL COMMITTE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 325/HYD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: Shri AV Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: MS. M. Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

section 13(1)(c) r.w.s.13(2)(c) of the Act. Further, the Assessing Officer after considering relevant provisions of the Act and also applying provisions of sec.40A(2)(a) observed that, appellant society has made excessive and unreasonable payment to the above two companies for rendering services which cannot be allowed as deduction. Thus, the Assessing Officer disallowed

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 92CSection 92E

Disallowance of CSR expenses of Rs. 1,42,97,133/- against the returned income of Rs. 50,81,16,931/-. 2.1 Feeling aggrieved, the assessee raised certain objections before the Ld. DRP. The Ld. DRP, after considering the submissions of the assessee and also going through the material available on record, dismissed the objections raised by the assessee. Thereafter

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. TKR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 511/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Mar 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 The Deputy Commissioner Vs. Tkr Educational Society, Of Income Tax, 16-2-751/A/31/Ctirumala (Exemptions), Hills, Malakpet, Hyderabad. Hyderabad, Telangana – 500036. Pan : Aaaat7850Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri A.V. Raghuram, Advocate. Revenue By: Shri M. Vijay Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 06.03.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 12.03.2024

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Vijay Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(C)Section 10BSection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 801B

10(23)(C)(vi) have not been uploaded in the software and therefore, disallowance was made by the CPC/Assessing Officer. Before the assessee’s application u/s 154 could have been adjudicated, the assessee had preferred the appeal before the ld.CIT(A) and also produced the copy of corrected copy of ITR-7 wherein the correct figures of exempt income were

JOGINPALLY B R EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 988/HYD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godara

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 10Section 10(23)(C)Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 148

section 10(23)(C) exemption in the course of assessment (s) as upheld in the CIT (A) following detailed lower appellate discussion: “02.0 The appellant is a registered society engaged in imparting education in the field of running Engineering College and Medical college. It filed its returns of Income ~ for assessment years under consideration claiming Page

J B EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 990/HYD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godara

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 10Section 10(23)(C)Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 148

section 10(23)(C) exemption in the course of assessment (s) as upheld in the CIT (A) following detailed lower appellate discussion: “02.0 The appellant is a registered society engaged in imparting education in the field of running Engineering College and Medical college. It filed its returns of Income ~ for assessment years under consideration claiming Page

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4) ,HYDERABAD , HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 260/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 257/HYD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

AURORA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4),HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 262/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 258/HYD/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4),HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 261/HYD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 259/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 256/HYD/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

TARAKARAMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 255/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

AURORA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4),HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 263/HYD/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

CHURCH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD ,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4) ,HYDERABAD , HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 275/HYD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

CHURCH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD ,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4) ,HYDERABAD , HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 270/HYD/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

CHURCH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD ,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4) ,HYDERABAD , HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 269/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed

AURORA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD ,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(4) ,HYDERABAD , HYDERABAD

Appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 268/HYD/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 10(23)(vi)Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 153A

10(23)(c)(vi) approvals stand restored and they also continue to enjoy Section 12AA registration, the natural corollary is that the assessing authority; or for that, the CIT(A) could not have disallowed