VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) was carried out in the case of the assessee company and its group on 14/03/2016 during which certain incriminating material was found and seized. Accordingly, notice under section 153A of the Act dated 17/07/2017 was issued and served on the assessee in response to which

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

disallowance\nu/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore,\nconsidering the overall scenario including relevant books of\n12\nITA.Nos.514 to 539/Hyd./2025,\nAnd ITA.Nos.308 to 311/Hyd./2025.\naccounts maintained by the assessee and incriminating\nmaterial found during the course of search observed that,\nthe profit percentage of undisclosed turnover found during\nthe course of search proceedings

ACE CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE -3(4), HYDERABAD vs. ROYAL ENGINEERING, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE3-(4), HYDERABAD vs. ROYAL ENGINEERING, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE -3(4), HYDERABAD vs. ROYAL ENGINEERING, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE3-(4), HYDERABAD vs. ACE CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place

ROYAL ENGINEERING,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place

ROYAL ENGINEERING,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarsl. आ.अपी.सं / निर्धारणारण वर्ष अपीलार्थी / प्रत्‍यर्थी / No.

disallowance on merits. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that the Assessing Officer has erred in invoking the provisions of section 153C of the Act to the year under reference which is beyond the period Page 2 of 31 of six years preceding the financial year in which the search took place