BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai77Delhi35Chennai29Ahmedabad18Pune12Kolkata10Visakhapatnam8Bangalore8SC6Rajkot3Chandigarh3Amritsar3Karnataka2Allahabad2Telangana2Hyderabad2Jaipur2Nagpur1Kerala1Cochin1Cuttack1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 283Section 37(1)2Section 292Addition to Income2

GMR HOSPITALITY AND RETAIL LIMITED (SUCCESSOR TO HYDERABAD DUTY FREE RETAIL LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 325/HYD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Sept 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godaraa.Y. 2016-17 Gmr Hospitality & Retail Vs. Income Tax Officer, Limited (Successor Of Ward-2(2), Hyderabad Duty Free Retail Hyderabad. Limited), Hyderabad. Pan: Aadcg 2928 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sunil Jain, Ar Revenue By Smt. M. Narmada, Dr Date Of Hearing: 02/09/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 16/09/2021 Order

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 28Section 29Section 37Section 37(1)

43D." "Section 37 :General. —(1) Any expenditure (not being expenditure of the nature described in sections 30 to 36 and not being in the nature of capital expenditure or personal expenses of the assessee), laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business or profession shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable under the head

THE ADARSH CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-11(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1336/HYD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Manmohan & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Adarsh Coopertaive Urban Bank Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Ltd., Hyderabad Income-Tax, Circle – 11(1), Hyderabad. Pan – Acupp 7381F

For Appellant: Shri DheerajFor Respondent: Shri P. Mohan Reddy
Section 2(1)(i)

depreciation accordingly. Therefore, the grounds of appeal No.1 to 3 are treated as allowed for statistical purposes.” As the issue under consideration is materially identical to that of AY 2013-14, following the conclusions drawn in AY 2013-14, we direct the AO to decide the issues in line with the directions given by the ITAT