BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 35Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi41Mumbai31Bangalore17Chennai10Kolkata5Pune5Hyderabad5SC4Ahmedabad3Cochin2Panaji2Guwahati2Visakhapatnam1Chandigarh1Jaipur1Karnataka1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Section 80I6Addition to Income4Section 144C(5)2Section 92C2Section 92C(3)2Section 2112Transfer Pricing2Deduction2

SRI RAMADAS PAPER BOARDS (P) LTD., HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1514/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2012-13 Sri Ramadas Paper Boards (P) Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Ltd., Hyderabad. Tax, Circle – 3(2), Hyderabad. Pan – Aadcs2140M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. HariFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 211

35A; or (iv) the amount of expenditure of a capital nature' referred to in clause (ix) of sub-section (1) of section 36; or ' (v) the cost of acquisition of a capital asset (not being a capital asset referred to in section 50) for the purposes of section 48, and the amount arrived at after such addition or deduction shall

Comparables/TP2
TP Method2

SITAPURAM POWER LIMITED-ERSTWHILE AMALGAMATING COMPANY (NOW AMALGAMATED COMPANY-ZUARI CEMENT LIMITED),KADAPA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 79/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad02 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Bleआआआआ आआआआ आआ./ I.T.A. (Tp) No.79/Hyd/2022 (आआआआआआआआ आआआआ / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Erstwhile Amalgamating Company Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of – Sitapuram Power Limited Income Tax, Pan:Aajcs2098E Circle-1, (Now Amalgamated Company – Nellore. Zuari Cement Limited), Kadapa. Pan:Aajcs2098E (आआआआआआआआआ/ Appellant) (आआआआआआआआआआ/ Respondent) आआआआआआआआआ आआ आआ आआ/ Appellant : Adv. Shri Deepak Chopra & Nitin Narang By आआआआआआआआआआआ आआ आआ आआ / : Shri Kumar Pranav, Cit-Dr Respondent By आआआआआआ आआ आआआआआ / Date Of : 15/05/2024 Hearing आआआआआ आआ आआआआआ/Date Of : 02/07/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Adv. Shri Deepak Chopra &
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 80ISection 92Section 92(3)Section 92BSection 92D

Section 35A, 35AB (3); 35ABB; 35D (5); 35DDA; 35E; 41 (1) (Any benefit accrued by the amalgamated co.) from cessation of liability of amalgamating company shall be taxed in the hands of the amalgamated company); 43 (1); 43 (6); 32 and 43 (6) (c); 43C; 47 (vi); (via) (viaa) (viab); 47 (vii); 72A; 72AB, etc. the transferee was in existence

AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 485/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri B.G.Reddy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 35

35A before the DRP on this ground also. 10. Submissions of the Assessee before DRP: i) Extending credit for realization of revenue from the AE is a closely linked transaction with the transaction of selling products to the AE and therefore the same cannot be treated a separate international transaction. The arm's length price determination for the said consequential

KONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

ITA 2305/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Kony India Private Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, Sez Unit Ii, Office Level-7, Circle-2(1), Building No. Ho6, Phoenix Room No.514, 5Th Floor, Info City Private Limited, Signature Towers, Opp. Serilingampally, Hyderabad Botanical Garden, – 500 081. Kondapur, Hyderabad-84. Pan: Aadck 2294 C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri H. Srinivasulu & Sri Kranthi Palivela Ca, Ars Revenue By: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 26/08/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/11/2019

For Appellant: Sri H. Srinivasulu & Sri KranthiFor Respondent: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

35A by the assessee raising objections regarding the draft assessment order passed on 04/09/2018 U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 92CA(3) r.w.s 144C of the Act however, the Ld. Members of the DRP upheld the entire upward adjustment of profit by Rs. 16,96,77,951/- and added to the income of the assessee based on which final assessment order

KONY IT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2304/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Kony It Services Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, 9Th Floor, B-6, South Tower, Circle-2(1), Divyasree Orion, Sy. Room No.514, 5Th Floor, No.66/1, Raidurgam, Rr Signature Towers, Opp. Dist., Hyderbad – 500 032. Botanical Garden, Pan: Aaeck 9066 D Kondapur, Hyderabad-84. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri H. Srinivasulu & Sri Kranthi Palivela Ca, Ars Revenue By: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 26/08/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/11/2019

For Appellant: Sri H. Srinivasulu & Sri KranthiFor Respondent: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

35A by the assessee raising objections regarding the draft assessment order passed on 04/09/2018 U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 92CA(3) r.w.s 144C of the Act however, the Ld. Members of the DRP upheld the entire upward adjustment of profit by Rs. 5,38,20,492/- and added to the income of the assessee based on which final assessment order