BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “depreciation”+ Section 292Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi58Bangalore49Mumbai28Jaipur13Chennai12Hyderabad8Cochin7Nagpur6Chandigarh5Ahmedabad3Indore2Rajkot2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)7Addition to Income7Search & Seizure7

SKANDA BUILDERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 530/HYD/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

292C, the AO held that the surrounding circumstances\ndo not support the entries in the seized documents. In this absence of\nsupporting evidence for the expenditure, the rebuttal presumption of\nauthenticity.\n\nI have examined the legal principles governing the treatment of seized\nmaterial were examined in light of judicial precedents. Sections 132(4A) and\n292C of the Income

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. NCC LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 77/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. NCC LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 78/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee

NCC LIMITED, ,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 73/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. NCC LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 79/HYD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee

NCC LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 75/HYD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee

NCC LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 74/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. NCC LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Accordingly, we delete the same. Thus, this ground is partly allowed

ITA 80/HYD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA &For Respondent: Shri K. Madhusudan, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)

292C that is required to undertake against the assessee as the document was found from the premises of the assessee referred to in para 4.12 and therefore, the contents thereof are required to be true. The learned DR further relied on the decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sun Engineering (supra) to buttress that the assessee