BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 11Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai31Delhi21Kolkata11Bangalore11Lucknow8SC7Indore6Karnataka4Chennai4Hyderabad4Cuttack3Pune3Visakhapatnam2Chandigarh1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 80l12Section 143(1)6Section 10A5Deduction4Section 143(3)3Section 251(1)(a)3Section 133A3Addition to Income3Survey u/s 133A3

TANVI FOODS (INDIA) LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS TANVI FOODS(INDIA) PVT LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 651/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 May 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 251(1)(a)Section 80l

section 80lB (11A) to disallow the claim of deduction u/s 80lB (11A) of the IT Act. 8. The learned Commissioner erred in determining the total income at Rs.3,60,29,033/- as against the admitted income of Rs.62,96,212/-. 9. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend or modify the above grounds of appeal either before

TANVI FOODS (INDIA) LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS TANVI FOODS(INDIA) PVT LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 652/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 May 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 251(1)(a)Section 80l

section 80lB (11A) to disallow the claim of deduction u/s 80lB (11A) of the IT Act. 8. The learned Commissioner erred in determining the total income at Rs.3,60,29,033/- as against the admitted income of Rs.62,96,212/-. 9. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend or modify the above grounds of appeal either before

TANVI FOODS (INDIA) LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS TANVI FOODS(INDIA) PVT LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 650/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 May 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 251(1)(a)Section 80l

section 80lB (11A) to disallow the claim of deduction u/s 80lB (11A) of the IT Act. 8. The learned Commissioner erred in determining the total income at Rs.3,60,29,033/- as against the admitted income of Rs.62,96,212/-. 9. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend or modify the above grounds of appeal either before

DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 151/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Dbs Technology Income Tax, Services India Private Circle – 8(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.2/Hyd/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Dbs Technology Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Circle – 8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Cross Objector / (Appellant/Revenue) Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm: The Appeal & Cross-Objection Filed By The Revenue For A.Y. 2019-20 Arise From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi

For Appellant: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)

11a[a Hindu undivided family, who is a resident other than not ordinarily resident, or a firm, other than limited liability partnership firm, which is a resident] deriving 12["income under the head Profits or gains of business or profession" and such income is computed in accordance with special provisions referred to in section 44AD, section 44ADA and section 44AE