BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “condonation of delay”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai67Kolkata56Delhi38Bangalore35Chennai34Ahmedabad17Hyderabad11Pune9Indore2Dehradun2Karnataka2Chandigarh1Telangana1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)19Transfer Pricing7Addition to Income6Comparables/TP5Section 2634Limitation/Time-bar4Section 92C3Condonation of Delay3Section 147

PRYSMIAN CAVI E SISTEMI S.R.L,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT (INT,TAXN)-2, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1242/HYD/2024[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad14 Jul 2025AY 2001-02
For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 263

method of estimation of income in this\nyear also. Consequently, the returned income based on the books of account should not be\nconsidered. AO is directed to examine the record and delete the incomes offered by assessee\non the above contract works, if the same was included again. The other incomes if any, however,\nare to be considered

D. E. SHAW INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

2
Section 92B2
Natural Justice2

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 1154/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1154/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2020-21) M/S. D.E. Shaw India Pvt. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Ltd., Hyderabad. Tax, Pan:Aaacd7214J Circle 8(1), Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, Adv. रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By: Ms. U. Mini Chandran, Sr-Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 01/09/2025 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 12/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By M/S. D E Shaw India Pvt. Ltd. (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Assessment Order Passed By The Learned Assessing Officer (“Ld. Ao”) U/S. 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) R.W.S. 144B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) Dated 27.06.2024 For The A.Y. 2020-21. 2. At The Outset, It Is Seen That There Is A Delay Of 66 Days In Filing Of The Present Appeal, For Which The Assessee Has Filed Condonation Petition Explaining The Reasons For Delay In Filing Of The Appeal. As Per Record, The Appeal Was Required To Be Filed On Or Before

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. U. Mini Chandran, SR-DR
Section 143(3)

delay of 66 days in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication on merits. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : 6. ITA No.1154/Hyd/2024 4 ITA No.1154/Hyd/2024 5 7. The facts of the case are that, the assessee is a company engaged in the business of providing Software Development Services

PRITHVI INFORMATION SOLUTIONS LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-16(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 47/HYD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali MohanRao, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Narender Kumar Naik
Section 143(3)

condone the delay of 623 days in filing the appeal and admit the same for adjudication on merits. 5. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : “ 1. Erred in making the addition of Rs. 24,88,54,488/- as adjustment towards arms length price in respect of the international truncations entered into with associated enterprises. 2. Erred

SATYAM VENTURE ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,SECUNDERABAD vs. ACIT, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 362/HYD/2021[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jun 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11 Satyam Venture Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Engineering Services Income Tax, Private Limited, Central Circle – 3(2), Secunderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcs3287D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri Ca S Subrahmanyam Revenue By: Dr. Rajendra Kumar, Cit Date Of Hearing: 23.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28.06.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Of Ld.Acit, Circle 3(2), Hyderabad Dt.30.04.2021 For The Assessment Year 2010-11 On The Following Grounds :

For Appellant: Sri CA S SubrahmanyamFor Respondent: Dr. Rajendra Kumar, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

condoned. Cases is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 3. The brief facts of the case are that assessee company filed its return of income for A.Y.2010-11 on 30-10-2010 declaring a total income of Rs.43,62,886/ -. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny. The case was referred to TPO as there were certain international transactions

PRIMERA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 381/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri PVSS Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Smt. L. Sunitha Rao, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

condone the delay. We, therefore, now shall proceed to hear the appeal and decide the same on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a company, engaged in the business of providing ITeS in the area of health information services, health information management, medical coding, Revenue cycle management, data quality services, core measures, electronic medical

OPEN TEXT CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (CORDYS SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED KNOWN MERGED WITH OPEN TEXT CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ),HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(2), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 2098/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Prashanth Meher Chandani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 92B

delay is condoned therefore. 3. There is no dispute between the parties that the assessee is engaged in providing software services so far as the impugned segment of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) adjustment is concerned since we are concerned with the correctness of ALP adjustment pertaining to interest on receivables only. It has further come on record that learned

OPEN TEXT CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED(CORDYS SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED IS NOW MERGED WITH OPEN TEXT CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 329/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Prashanth Meher Chandani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 92B

delay is condoned therefore. 3. There is no dispute between the parties that the assessee is engaged in providing software services so far as the impugned segment of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) adjustment is concerned since we are concerned with the correctness of ALP adjustment pertaining to interest on receivables only. It has further come on record that learned

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE 2(1), HYDERABAD vs. GREENKO RAYALA WIND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue and the cross-objections of assessee for both the years are dismissed

ITA 776/HYD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala, AR

delay is condoned. 3. Brief facts of the case as could be culled out from the record are that the assessee is a company engaged in the business of generation of wind power. They have filed their return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 on 30/11/2015 declaring an income of Rs. 1,27,87,370/- under normal provisions

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. GREENKO RAYALA WIND POWER PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue and the cross-objections of assessee for both the years are dismissed

ITA 51/HYD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala, AR

delay is condoned. 3. Brief facts of the case as could be culled out from the record are that the assessee is a company engaged in the business of generation of wind power. They have filed their return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 on 30/11/2015 declaring an income of Rs. 1,27,87,370/- under normal provisions

ADP PRIVATE LIMITED (31/10/2015),RANGA REDDY vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1( 1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 227/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri H. SrinivasuluFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai
Section 143(3)Section 92C

condoned. Case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee company M/s. ADP Private Limited with PAN of AAACW2655C is engaged in providing broad range of software development, maintenance & support services and Information Technology Enabled Services to its Associated Enterprises. It filed its Return of Income

ADP PRIVATE LIMITED,RANGA REDDY vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1( 1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 228/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri H. SrinivasuluFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai
Section 143(3)Section 92C

condoned. Case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessee company M/s. ADP Private Limited with PAN of AAACW2655C is engaged in providing broad range of software development, maintenance & support services and Information Technology Enabled Services to its Associated Enterprises. It filed its Return of Income