BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80G(5)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune177Mumbai153Chennai147Ahmedabad143Kolkata87Jaipur80Delhi45Bangalore42Surat30Hyderabad28Lucknow16Nagpur15Rajkot13Chandigarh13Indore9Agra6Jabalpur6Amritsar5Panaji4Jodhpur3Cochin3Visakhapatnam2Cuttack2Guwahati1SC1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 12A91Section 80G49Section 12A(1)(ac)27Exemption26Section 80G(5)24Limitation/Time-bar19Condonation of Delay15Natural Justice14Charitable Trust

WE ARE WITH YOU CHARITABLE TRUST,ADDANKI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 371/HYD/2024[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Sept 2024AY 2022-2023

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

condone the delay in filing of Form 10AB, rejected the application of the assessee. 6. Similar issue came before the coordinate bench of ITAT, in the case of Shri Ramajayam Charitable Trust Vs. ITO (Exemptions) in ITA Nos.827, 875 & 1136/Chny/2023 dated 08/03/2024, where at para No. 7.8 held as under : ITA No.371/Hyd/2024 3 “7.8 After hearing the arguments

YUG NIRMAN YOJANA GAYATRI PARIWAR TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

9
Section 126
Section 143(3)4
Addition to Income4
ITA 494/HYD/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Us:

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

iii), the assessee trust in response to notices issued by the CIT(Exemptions), dated 10.10.2024 and 26.12.2024, vide its replies submitted the requisite details/information in response to the queries that were raised by him. Yug Nirman Yojana Gayatri Pariwar Trust 3 4. However, the CIT(Exemptions) rejected the said application vide order dated 18.02.2025 on the ground that the assessee

SEVAGRAMAM CHARITABLE TRUST,HYDERABAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

ITA 562/HYD/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Us:

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

iii). that the CIT(Exemption) had not drawn any adverse findings on the merits or documents filed by the assessee trust; and (iv). that the CIT (Exemption) has failed to exercise the discretion vested with him under the proviso to Section 12A(1)(ac) for condoning the delay involved in the application filed by the assessee trust. 7. We have

SEVAGRAMAM CHARITABLE TRUST,HYDERABAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

ITA 563/HYD/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Us:

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

iii). that the CIT(Exemption) had not drawn any adverse findings on the merits or documents filed by the assessee trust; and (iv). that the CIT (Exemption) has failed to exercise the discretion vested with him under the proviso to Section 12A(1)(ac) for condoning the delay involved in the application filed by the assessee trust. 7. We have

BLOOD WARRIORS FOUNDATION,HYDERABAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

ITA 41/HYD/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Feb 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA (Vice President), SHRI LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Akkam Akhil Yadav, ARFor Respondent: Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iv)Section 8O

iii) for first proviso to section 8OG(5). However, in the Form 10AB clause is erroneously selected as clause (ii) of first proviso to section 80G(5). However, in the Form 10AB clause is erroneously selected as clause (ii) of first proviso to section 80G(5). By the oversight missed filing of Form 10Ab, within 6 months of the date

SRI MAISAMMA DEVATNA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1050/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1043/Hyd/2025 Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Cit (Exemptions) Devasthanam, Hyderabad Mahbubnagar Pan: Aahts2887G 2 1044/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1049/Hyd/2025 Sri Maisamma Devatna -Do- Ammavari Devasthanam Mahbubnagar Pan:Aamts0357A 4 1050/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do-

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Narender Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80G

condone the delay of 19 days in filing the appeals in case of Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Devasthanam and Sri Maisamma Devatna Ammavari Devasthanam, Mahabubnagar. 7. The assessees have raised common grounds of appeal in all the 4 appeals. For the sake brevity, grounds raised by the assessee in ITA No.1043 and 1044/Hyd/2025 are reproduced hereunder: Page 5

SRI KURUMURTHY SWAMY DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1044/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1043/Hyd/2025 Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Cit (Exemptions) Devasthanam, Hyderabad Mahbubnagar Pan: Aahts2887G 2 1044/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1049/Hyd/2025 Sri Maisamma Devatna -Do- Ammavari Devasthanam Mahbubnagar Pan:Aamts0357A 4 1050/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do-

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Narender Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80G

condone the delay of 19 days in filing the appeals in case of Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Devasthanam and Sri Maisamma Devatna Ammavari Devasthanam, Mahabubnagar. 7. The assessees have raised common grounds of appeal in all the 4 appeals. For the sake brevity, grounds raised by the assessee in ITA No.1043 and 1044/Hyd/2025 are reproduced hereunder: Page 5

SRI KURUMURTHY SWAMY DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1043/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1043/Hyd/2025 Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Cit (Exemptions) Devasthanam, Hyderabad Mahbubnagar Pan: Aahts2887G 2 1044/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1049/Hyd/2025 Sri Maisamma Devatna -Do- Ammavari Devasthanam Mahbubnagar Pan:Aamts0357A 4 1050/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do-

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Narender Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80G

condone the delay of 19 days in filing the appeals in case of Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Devasthanam and Sri Maisamma Devatna Ammavari Devasthanam, Mahabubnagar. 7. The assessees have raised common grounds of appeal in all the 4 appeals. For the sake brevity, grounds raised by the assessee in ITA No.1043 and 1044/Hyd/2025 are reproduced hereunder: Page 5

SRI MAISAMMA DEVATNA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM,MAHABUBNAGAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1049/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1043/Hyd/2025 Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Cit (Exemptions) Devasthanam, Hyderabad Mahbubnagar Pan: Aahts2887G 2 1044/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1049/Hyd/2025 Sri Maisamma Devatna -Do- Ammavari Devasthanam Mahbubnagar Pan:Aamts0357A 4 1050/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do-

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: : Dr. Narender Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 80G

condone the delay of 19 days in filing the appeals in case of Sri Kurumurthy Swamy Devasthanam and Sri Maisamma Devatna Ammavari Devasthanam, Mahabubnagar. 7. The assessees have raised common grounds of appeal in all the 4 appeals. For the sake brevity, grounds raised by the assessee in ITA No.1043 and 1044/Hyd/2025 are reproduced hereunder: Page 5

SRI AJEYA SANKARA TRUST,TIRUPATI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1366/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Nov 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1366/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2025-26) Sri Ajeya Sankara Trust Vs. Cit (Exemption) Tirupati Hyderabad Pan:Aaxts2264F (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocate H. Srinivasulu राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr.Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 16/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 12/11/2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated, 17/05/2025 Of Cit (Exemption) Whereby The Application Of The Assessee In Form 10Ab Seeking Regular Approval U/S 80G Of The Act Was Rejected On The Ground Of Barred By Limitation.

For Appellant: Advocate H. SrinivasuluFor Respondent: : Dr.Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

delay in fling the application for Renewal of 80G may kindly be condoned and request to grant 80G Renewal.” 7. The limitation for filing the application for grant of regular approval u/sec.80G(5) of the Act is provided in third proviso to this sub-section as under : Page 7 of 12 ITA No 1366 of 2025 Sri Ajeya Sankara Trust

UNICORPUS HEALTH FOUNDATION,SECUNDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1292/HYD/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Mar 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble Accountnt Member आ.अपी.सं / Ita No.1292/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2022-23) Unicorpus Health Commissioner Of Income Tax Foundation Vs. (Exemptions) Secunderabad Hyderabad [Pan : Aabcu8838L] अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R E Balasubramanyan, ARFor Respondent: Smt. M Narmada, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(i)Section 80G(5)(iii)

5. Per contra, Ld.DR relied on the order of Ld.CIT(E). 6. We have considered rival contentions and perused the material available on record in view of the submissions made by either parties. It is evident that the assessee had a valid registration under section 80G of the Act and had applied for renewal within the extended due date

SREE SREE SREE VEERANJANEYA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM GANDIKSHETRAM CHAKRAYAPE,KADAPA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1028/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SRI JHAMSINGH BALAJI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, HYDERABAD. vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAB

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1024/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SRI JHAMSINGH BALAJI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE,HYDERABAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1023/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SREE RAMAKRISHNA HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE,KADAPA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1022/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SREE RAMAKRISHNA HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE,KADAPA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1021/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SRI VEERANJANEYA SWAMY NITHYA ANNADAANAM TRUST,KADAPA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1029/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SRI VEERANJANEYA SWAMY NITHYA ANNADAANAM TRUST,KADAPA vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1030/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

SREE SREE SREE VEERANJANEYA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM GANDIKSHETRAM CHAKRAYAPE,KADAPA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD.

In the result, appeals filed by all the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1027/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.S.No Ita No Appellant Respondent 1 1021/Hyd/2025 Sree Rama Krtishna High Cit (Exemptions) School Committee Kadapa Hyderabad Pan:Abmas5115J 2 1022/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 3 1023/Hyd/2025 Sri Jhamsingh Balaji -Do- Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Hyderabad Pan: Aabts6884P 4 1024/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 5 1027/Hyd/2025 Sree Sree Sree -Do- Veeranjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam Gandikshetram Chakrayape Kadapa, Pan: Aatts6060R 6 1028/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- 7 1029/Hyd/2025 Sri Veeranjaneya Swamy -Do- Nithya Annadanam Trust, Kadapa, Pan: Aafts2637C 8 1030/Hyd/2025 -Do- -Do- िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 10/09/2025 आदेश/Order Per Bench: These Are 4 Set Of 2 Appeals By 4 Assessees Filed Against 8 Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit (Exemptions) Dated 12/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 13/03/2025, 17/03/2025, 12/03/2025 & 17/03/2025

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G

condone the delay of 11 & 13 days in filing of these 8 appeals. 7. In all these 4 set of 2 appeals, the assessees have raised common grounds. In the appeals filed against the rejection of application for registration u/s 12AB and rejection of application for approval u/s 80G of the Act, the grounds raised in ITA No.1021 and 1023/Hyd/2025

GOVARDHANA GIRISHWARA DEVASTHANAM TRUST,TIRUPATI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

ITA 671/HYD/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Us:

Section 12Section 12A

condoning the delay in submission of application. In the hearing notices dated 10-10-2024 and 26-12-2024, there is no whisper of delayed submission of application and neither cause of delay nor justification was asked for the same, whereby the Assessee was thus under a genuine and bona fide belief that its application for seeking regular registration under