SANGEETA AKKARAJU CHANDRASEKHAR,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-14(1), HYDERABAD
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 1076/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: The Tribunal. The Assessee Has Filed An Affidavit In Support Of The Condonation Petition, Wherein She Has Mentioned The Reasons For The Delay & Submitted That The Delay Occurred Due To Factors Beyond Her Control, With No Deliberate Intention To Defer The Filing Of The Appeal. On The Other Hand, The Learned Senior A.R. For The Revenue, Shri Mathivanan, S.A. Did Not Strongly Oppose The Condonation Of Delay Petition Filed By The Assessee.
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 80CSection 80T
condone the delay of 25 days
3
Sangeeta Akkaraju Chandrasekhar
in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and admit the appeal for adjudication.
4. The brief facts of the case are that, in this case, information has been flagged in the Actionable Information Monitoring System.
On verification, it is found that, the assessee has not filed any return of income
