BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 7Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi21Mumbai19Chennai12Hyderabad12Kolkata10Ahmedabad8Jaipur6Raipur5Rajasthan4Amritsar3Calcutta3Telangana3Cuttack2Bangalore2Rajkot2Orissa1Cochin1Guwahati1SC1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 80I33Section 12A10Section 143(3)9Deduction9Addition to Income9Section 80G8Section 153A7Section 357Section 132

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 239/HYD/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar Chakrapany, C.AFor Respondent: Smt.Mamata Choudhary
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centers as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

3
Section 115J3
Disallowance3
Condonation of Delay3

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 241/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar Chakrapany, C.AFor Respondent: Smt.Mamata Choudhary
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centers as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 240/HYD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar Chakrapany, C.AFor Respondent: Smt.Mamata Choudhary
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centers as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 605/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centres as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 604/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centres as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 603/HYD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centres as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 606/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

7A) of section 80-IB or convention centres as defined in sub-section (7B) of section 80-IB 75[or hospitals in rural areas as defined in sub-section (11B) of section 80-IB], shall be in Form No. 10CCB. (2) A separate report is to be furnished by each undertaking or enterprise of the assessee claiming deduction under section

NNF - STATE CHAPTER,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2199/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Shri P. Soma Sekhar Reddy, DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

7A, Surya Towers, Secunderabad, do hereby affirm and state on oath that: …... …… 3. As I was busy with filing of income tax returns and tax audit during that period, I forgot to inform the client of the receipt of the order. 4. I have sent the Form 36 along with the petition for condonation of delay and affidavit for signature

NNF - STATE CHAPTER,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2200/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Shri P. Soma Sekhar Reddy, DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

7A, Surya Towers, Secunderabad, do hereby affirm and state on oath that: …... …… 3. As I was busy with filing of income tax returns and tax audit during that period, I forgot to inform the client of the receipt of the order. 4. I have sent the Form 36 along with the petition for condonation of delay and affidavit for signature

DRS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

ITA 261/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Nov 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2015-16 Drs Educational Society, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward-10(1), Pan: Aaatd 4737 D Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Venkatesh For M.V. Anil Kumar Revenue By: Shri Nilanjan Dey – Dr Date Of Hearing: 19/11/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 19/11/2019 Order

For Appellant: Shri Venkatesh for M.V. AnilFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey – DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 250(6)Section 28Section 40

section 28 to 43C are not applicable, therefore the disallowance of Rs. 1,73,690 U/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act is bad in law. 6. Your appellant submits that the NBFCs have filed the return of income and paid taxes therefore disallowance U/s. 40(a)(ia) is not warranted. 7. Your appellant submits for these and such other

M/S VISAKA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,,SECUNDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE 3, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 172/HYD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Apr 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri B. Ramakotaiahassessment Year: 2010-11 M/S Visaka Industries Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Limited, Secunderabad. Income Tax, Range-3, Hyderabad. Pan- Aaacv7263K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri M.V. Anil Kumar Revenue By : Smt. Mini Chandran

For Appellant: Shri M.V. Anil KumarFor Respondent: Smt. Mini Chandran
Section 80I

delay of one day is condoned. 3. Assessee has raised the following grounds: “1. Your Appellant submits that the CIT(A) ought to have allowed Rs. 49,59,201/- being the amount written off towards obsolete stock, incurred in the course of business and exclusively for the purpose of business I the year they have become obsolete

RCC LABORATORIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 1800/HYD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Aug 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohana Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, DR
Section 143(3)Section 35

delay is condoned therefore. 3. It emerges at the outset that all these three appeals raise former issue in ITA No.1800/Hyd/2018 and sole substantive grievance in latter twin cases; seeks to challenge both the lower authorities’ action denying Section 35(2AB) weighted deduction claim(s) of Rs.2,61,32,524/-, Rs.86,01,037/- and Rs.4,81,64,481/-; respectively