BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi43Chennai27Amritsar27Mumbai27Bangalore22Kolkata19Jaipur14Nagpur12Ahmedabad9Cuttack6Raipur6Visakhapatnam4Cochin4Indore4Hyderabad3Lucknow2Dehradun2SC2Surat2Pune2Agra1Chandigarh1Calcutta1Rajkot1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)14Section 1549Section 153A8Section 1446Section 92C4Section 144C(1)3Section 292B2Section 143(2)2Limitation/Time-bar

LANCO SOLAR PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed and Stay Application filed by assessee is dismissed

ITA 239/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Murali Mohan Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT, D.R
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(2)Section 154Section 156Section 92C

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeal on merit. 11. Coming to the merits of the case we notice that 154 order was passed by the AO on 19.6.2018 as per the advise of TPO order dated 1.5.2018, no doubt the order passed by TPO is based on rectification of error noticed

2
Condonation of Delay2

INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,WARD -2(1), HYDERABAD vs. OM PRAKASH JHAKHOTIA, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals and the cross objections are dismissed

ITA 284/HYD/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ramkishore Jhawar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sunku Srinivas, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 292B

condonation of delay, the fact remains that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Suo Motu proceedings in the case of Miscellaneous Application No. 665/2021 in SMW(C) No.3 of 2020 has held that in computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15 March, 2020 till 02 October, 2021 shall be excluded

INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,WARD -2(1) , HYDERABAD vs. OM PRAKASH JHAKHOTIA , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals and the cross objections are dismissed

ITA 283/HYD/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri Ramkishore Jhawar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sunku Srinivas, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 153ASection 292B

condonation of delay, the fact remains that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Suo Motu proceedings in the case of Miscellaneous Application No. 665/2021 in SMW(C) No.3 of 2020 has held that in computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from 15 March, 2020 till 02 October, 2021 shall be excluded