Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 285Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai66 Mumbai6 Bangalore4 Hyderabad2 Delhi1

Key Topics

Section 285B10 Section 271F5 Penalty2

ADDALA CHANTI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-13(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 887/HYD/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 May 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt Neeju Gupta, DR

Section 143(3)Section 272A(2)(C)Section 272A(2)(c)Section 285

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeal on merits. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual carrying on business as a Film Producer filed the return of income for the A.Y. 2003-04 on 24/11/2003 admitting a total income of Rs. 14,05,681/-. The said return was processed

ADDALA CHANTI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-13(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

THE CUMBUM CO-OPERATIVE TOWN BANK LIMITED ,PRAKASAM vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (I&CI), HYDERABAD

ADDALA CHANTI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-13(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

THE CUMBUM CO-OPERATIVE TOWN BANK LIMITED ,PRAKASAM vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (I&CI), HYDERABAD