BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 279(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai172Karnataka103Chandigarh65Mumbai61Delhi28Kolkata28Bangalore19Jaipur16Cochin13Cuttack10Pune10Hyderabad8Ahmedabad7Patna7Nagpur7Surat6Lucknow4SC3Visakhapatnam2Amritsar2Indore2Jodhpur2Raipur2Agra1Rajasthan1Guwahati1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)14Section 115J7Section 279(1)7Section 1437TDS7Section 403

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 720/HYD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 721/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 716/HYD/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 718/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 722/HYD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 719/HYD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ELITE INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 717/HYD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Dec 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Ms. C.S.Sree Lekha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madan Mohan Meena, DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(1)Section 279(1)

279(1) of the Act. 3. Aggrieved with the intimation order passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 24.01.2012 assessee filed appeal before the LD.CIT(A). 4. Aggrieved with such intimation order dt.24.01.2012, assessee preferred appeal on 05.02.2022 i.e., after ten years from the date of intimation order. As the assessee failed to explain the reasons for not filing

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-9(1)., HYDERABAD vs. JASTI SEETHAMAHALAKSHMI., HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed and Cross-Objection of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1185/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B. Ramakotaiah

For Appellant: Shri M. Chandramouleswara Rao, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, DR
Section 201(1)Section 40

delay is condoned and Cross-Objection is admitted. As noted from the order of AO and also from the Cross-Objection raised, the tax effect is only Rs. 1,91,336/- and hence Revenue cannot prefer the appeal I.T.A. No. 1185/Hyd/2017 :- 3 -: & C.O.No. 35/Hyd/2017 against the order of CIT(A) vide Circular No.21/2015 dated 10th December, 2015, bearing F.No.279