BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

23 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka121Chennai78Mumbai73Nagpur54Kolkata48Raipur45Delhi44Amritsar37Surat29Panaji29Bangalore27Cuttack24Hyderabad23Jaipur17Pune12Lucknow9Visakhapatnam7Calcutta6Chandigarh5Indore5Ahmedabad3Rajkot3Patna3SC2Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Allahabad1Rajasthan1Varanasi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E78Section 200A65Section 20013TDS13Section 153A9Addition to Income9Section 1486Limitation/Time-bar6Section 144

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

condoning the delay. and the remaining ground nos.4 to 16 for discussion can be summarized as follows: 1) Ground 4: Disallowance of Rs.24,94,00,000 under section 40A(3) of the Act. 2) Grounds 5 to 7: Disallowance of Rs.21,08,45,001 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3) Grounds 8 and 9: Payments made

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 1474
Section 404
Deduction4

PATTABHI BARAPATI,KOTHAGUDEM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KOTHAGUDEM

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1391/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita.No.1391/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2017-2018 Pattabhi Barapati, The Income Tax Officer, Kothagudem – 507 101. Ward-1, Kothagudem. Khammam District. Vs. Pin – 507 101. Pan Auhpb5358H Telangana. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By : Sri Poorna Chander Rao, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By : Sri Karthik Manickam, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 06.04.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 08.04.2026 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao:

For Appellant: Sri Poorna Chander Rao, CAFor Respondent: Sri Karthik Manickam, Sr. AR
Section 10(1)Section 250Section 253(3)

delay of 272 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. 5. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. “The appellant contends the confirming of addition of Rs.11,81,515 by the learned Assessing Officer (AU) of which Rs.10,37,000/- by invoking the provisions of section

DATAFORMIX ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1421/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2013-14 Dataformix Enterprise V Ito,Ward-17(1) Solutions Private Limited S. Signature Towers 1-33-47, Rtc Colony, Kondapur Gunrock, Tirumalgiri Hyderabad-500 004 Secunderabad-500 0074

For Appellant: Shri Mohd Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R.Murthy

272 days 3. The ld. AR for the assessee has submitted that delay in filling the appeal may be condoned . The Ld.DR for the revenue has not objected to the condonation of delay in filing the appeal by the assessee 3 ITA.No.1421/Hyd/2019 4. We have heard the rival contention the parties and perused the material available on record

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 278/HYD/2022[2013-14- TDS-26Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 277/HYD/2022[2013-14TDS 26Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 288/HYD/2022[2013-14 TDS 26Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 289/HYD/2022[2013-14 TDS 26Q-Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 290/HYD/2022[2013-14 TDS 26Q-Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 291/HYD/2022[2014-15 TDS-26Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 292/HYD/2022[2014-15 TDS 26Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 293/HYD/2022[2014-15 TDS 26Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 272/HYD/2022[2013-14- TDS-24Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 273/HYD/2022[2013-14- TDS-24Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 274/HYD/2022[2013-14TDS 24Q-Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 275/HYD/2022[2014-15-TDS-24Q-Q]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 276/HYD/2022[2014-15-TDS-24Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

272 to 278/Hyd/2022 are filed with a delay of seven days and that the Ld. CIT(A) disposed of three appeals, namely, for the fourth quarter of assessment year 2013-14, second and third quarters of assessment year 2014-15 in duplicate, namely, the appeal filed in physical form as well as once submitted on-line. Insofar as the appeals

VENKATA SUDHAKAR SIMHADRI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 382/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accounant Member आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.382/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14) Shri Venkata Sudhakar Dcit, Circle 2(1), Vs. Hyderabad. Simhadri, Hyderabad. Pan : Avnps0649D (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri Y. V. Bhanu Narayan Rao, C.A. रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By:: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 18/06/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 19/06/2024

For Appellant: Shri Y. V. Bhanu NarayanFor Respondent: : Smt. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 234BSection 69

delay of 56 days in filing of this appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. The grounds raised by the assessee reads as under : “1. That the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, upholding the assessment order passed u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B

(LATE) LAXMAN RAO BANAPURAM REP BY L/R B RAMA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-14(1), HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2017-2018 is dismissed

ITA 603/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: CA KA Sai PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Srinath Sadanala, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 142Section 153ASection 54F

condone the delay of 47 days in filing the instant appeals before the Tribunal and admit the appeals for adjudication. 3. The brief acts of the case are that, the assessee is an individual and has filed his original return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 on 11.11.2014 declaring total income of Rs.1,648/- and for the assessment

(LATE) LAXMAN RAO BANAPURAM REP BY L/R B RAMA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT-CIRCLE-14(1), HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2017-2018 is dismissed

ITA 601/HYD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: CA KA Sai PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Srinath Sadanala, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 142Section 153ASection 54F

condone the delay of 47 days in filing the instant appeals before the Tribunal and admit the appeals for adjudication. 3. The brief acts of the case are that, the assessee is an individual and has filed his original return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 on 11.11.2014 declaring total income of Rs.1,648/- and for the assessment

(LATE) LAXMAN RAO BANAPURAM, REP BY L/R B RAMA DEVI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-14(1), HYDERABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2017-2018 is dismissed

ITA 602/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: CA KA Sai PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Srinath Sadanala, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 142Section 153ASection 54F

condone the delay of 47 days in filing the instant appeals before the Tribunal and admit the appeals for adjudication. 3. The brief acts of the case are that, the assessee is an individual and has filed his original return of income for the assessment year 2014-15 on 11.11.2014 declaring total income of Rs.1,648/- and for the assessment