BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai58Karnataka21Mumbai13Pune11Ahmedabad11Delhi11Bangalore8Visakhapatnam7Jaipur7Kolkata7Amritsar6Lucknow6Guwahati3Hyderabad3Raipur3Surat3Cochin2SC2Patna1Cuttack1Jabalpur1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 271A5Penalty3Condonation of Delay3Section 1472Section 44A2Section 143(3)2

SHANKAR GOUD BALAGONI ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-15(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the penalty is deleted

ITA 1211/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Jun 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla & Mr. Anil Chaturvedi[Through Video Conferencing At Delhi] आयकरअपील सं. / Ita No.1211/H/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2013-14 Shankar Goud Balagoni, C/O P Murali & Co. Chartered Accountants 6-3-655/2/3, Somajiguda, Hyderabad — 500082 ….. अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan No. Afcpa 0544 E Vs. Ito, Ward – 15(4), Hyderabad ….. "त् यथ"/Respondent

For Respondent: Shri Sunku Srinivasu, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 44A

condone the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to dispose of the appeal on merits. 9. On the merits of the case, Learned AR submitted that the penalty in the present case has been levied u/s 271A of the Act. He submits that the penalty under section

GANGAMAGROTECH,HINDUPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, HINDUPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee allowed

ITA 1217/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: CA, Ashwani KumarFor Respondent: Sri TV Vamshidhar, Sr. AR
Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 274Section 44ASection 68

condone the delay of 321 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 5. Brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a Firm and had not filed it’s return of income for the assessment year 2013-2014. As per the Insight portal of the Department, a search and seizure operation

ADDALA CHANTI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-13(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 887/HYD/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 May 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt Neeju Gupta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 272A(2)(C)Section 272A(2)(c)Section 285

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeal on merits. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual carrying on business as a Film Producer filed the return of income for the A.Y. 2003-04 on 24/11/2003 admitting a total income of Rs. 14,05,681/-. The said return was processed