BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 246A(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi157Chennai64Pune50Mumbai42Bangalore35Indore25Panaji19Ahmedabad17Kolkata12Jaipur10Patna9Nagpur9Jodhpur9Chandigarh9Visakhapatnam7Raipur5Lucknow4Hyderabad2Cuttack2Agra1Jabalpur1Allahabad1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 200A12Section 234E10Section 246A6Section 200A(1)3TDS2Limitation/Time-bar2

V-SECURE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1906/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2013-14 V- Secure Financial Services Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. Ward – 17(4), Hyderabad.

For Appellant: Shri T. Rajendra PrasadFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 246(1)(a)Section 246A

delay that such an order was not appealable at that point of time as submitted by the assessee V-Secure Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. are not sustainable as the orders passed u/s 200A were appealable orders as per the provisions of section 246A. However, the assessee has now brought to our notice the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court

MSV SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, WARD-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1491/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Years: 2013-14 Msv It Solutions Pvt. Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Tds Ltd., Hyderabad. Ward – 1(4), Hyderabad. Pan – Aahcm6063B Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri T. Rajendra Prasad Revenue By: Shri Nilanjan Dey Date Of Hearing: 12/11/2018 Date Of Pronouncement: 06/12/2018 O R D E R Per S. Rifaur Rahman, Am:

For Appellant: Shri T. Rajendra PrasadFor Respondent: Shri Nilanjan Dey
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246ASection 246A(1)(a)Section 249(3)

condone the delay and not admitted the appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4. I have considered the submission made by the AR. From the submissions of the AR. I am constrained to note that the AR completely misconstrued and misunderstood the Issue with regard to maintainability of appeals on order u/s.200A(1). The order u/s.200A(1