BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

53 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Pune431Chennai392Delhi224Bangalore212Cochin93Mumbai84Nagpur81Visakhapatnam59Hyderabad53Jaipur38Dehradun21Karnataka21Ahmedabad14Kolkata11Agra10Amritsar10Lucknow10Panaji10Jodhpur9Rajkot8Indore8Raipur6Surat5Chandigarh5Ranchi4Guwahati2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 200A259Section 234E250Section 15467TDS53Limitation/Time-bar16Section 20015Condonation of Delay14Section 220(2)10Section 201

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 718/HYD/2022[24Q Quarter 4 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

Showing 1–20 of 53 · Page 1 of 3

10
Section 200A(1)10
Rectification u/s 1548
Section 249(2)7

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 719/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 2-2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 716/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 3 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 715/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter2 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 720/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 4 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 721/HYD/2022[26Q Quarter 1 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

SURESH SAMAT HUF,SECUNDERABAD vs. DCIT, WARD-10(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the seven appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 717/HYD/2022[26Q QUARTER-4 2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Muttha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 249(2)

section 249(2)( b) of the Act) in the filing of this appeal on the grounds that the delay in filing of appeal was on account of him seeking remedy u/s 154 of the Act and as he was unable to get any order from the department, the appeal has been filed which delay for this reason was requested

VIVIMED LABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), HYDERABAD

ITA 1237/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan
Section 154Section 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250Section 311

delayed in filing the TDS returns, rendering it exigible to saddling of fees under section 234E of the Act. 17. We have given thoughtful consideration to the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case in MA 21 of 2022, dated 10/01/2022 r.w. MA No.29 of 2022 r.w. MA No.665 of 2021, wherein it had after taking cognizance

VIVIMED LABS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee company, being devoid and bereft of any substance, is dismissed

ITA 1236/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1236 & 1237/Hyd/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2021-22 & 2022-23) Vivimed Labs Limited, Vs. Dcit, Hyderabad. Central Circle-3(4), Pan: Aaacv6060A Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, Ca राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 05/01/2026 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 21/01/2026 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri K. Vinoth Kannan
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250Section 311

delayed in filing the Vivimed Labs Limited vs. DCIT TDS returns, rendering it exigible to saddling of fees under section 234E of the Act. 17. We have given thoughtful consideration to the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case in MA 21 of 2022, dated 10/01/2022 r.w. MA No.29 of 2022 r.w. MA No.665 of 2021, wherein

V-SECURE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1906/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2013-14 V- Secure Financial Services Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. Ward – 17(4), Hyderabad.

For Appellant: Shri T. Rajendra PrasadFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 246(1)(a)Section 246A

delay that such an order was not appealable at that point of time as submitted by the assessee V-Secure Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. are not sustainable as the orders passed u/s 200A were appealable orders as per the provisions of section 246A. However, the assessee has now brought to our notice the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 290/HYD/2022[2013-14 TDS 26Q-Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 277/HYD/2022[2013-14TDS 26Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 288/HYD/2022[2013-14 TDS 26Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS(TDS),WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 289/HYD/2022[2013-14 TDS 26Q-Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 273/HYD/2022[2013-14- TDS-24Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 272/HYD/2022[2013-14- TDS-24Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 276/HYD/2022[2014-15-TDS-24Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 274/HYD/2022[2013-14TDS 24Q-Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO (TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 291/HYD/2022[2014-15 TDS-26Q-Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E

VISKAAN PHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO(TDS), WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all these appeals are allowed

ITA 278/HYD/2022[2013-14- TDS-26Q-Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri D. Venugopal, ARFor Respondent: Shri K.P.R.R. Murthy, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 4. Grievance of the assessee in all these appeals is that the fee under section 234E