BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 153Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi118Chennai67Amritsar60Bangalore33Chandigarh27Jaipur22Pune13Nagpur12Mumbai9Hyderabad7Raipur6Ahmedabad5Lucknow5Rajkot5Patna4Kolkata3Dehradun2Visakhapatnam1Guwahati1Orissa1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)8Addition to Income7Section 153D6Section 153A5Section 2635Section 69A5Section 1323Limitation/Time-bar3Section 37(1)

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 67/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 May 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accounant Member Assessment Year: 2020-21 Rakesh Kumar Jain, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of 1-10-1/ 1, Flat No.301, Income Tax, Ratna Rekha Apartment, Central Circle – 1(4), Hyderabad – 500020, Hyderabad. Telangana. Pan : Alzpj1233A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Mohd. Afzal, Advocate. Revenue By: Shri B. Bala Krishna, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 02.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.05.2024 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. The Appeal Of The Assessee For A.Y. 2020-21 Arises From Order Of Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad (“ Ld. Pcit”) Dt.06.11.2023 Passed U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, “The Act”). 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Read As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 115BSection 132ASection 143(3)Section 153DSection 263
2
Section 372
Disallowance2
Section 44A
Section 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 4. The brief facts of the case are that cash of Rs. 1,00,70,000/- was seized by police from the assessee and then handed over the cash to the income tax department. The Income tax department in the absence of proper documentary evidence regarding the sources of cash, seized

TRINITY CLEANTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 543/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri CA P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar – CIT DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 35DSection 37Section 37(1)

section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”). 2. The appeal i.e., ITA 543/Hyd/2021 filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 19 days. It has moved a condonation petition explaining reasons thereof. We have heard both the parties on this preliminary issue. Having regard to the reasons given in the petition

TRINITY CLEANTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 470/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri CA P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar – CIT DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153DSection 35DSection 37Section 37(1)

section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”). 2. The appeal i.e., ITA 543/Hyd/2021 filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 19 days. It has moved a condonation petition explaining reasons thereof. We have heard both the parties on this preliminary issue. Having regard to the reasons given in the petition

AJAZ FAROOQI ,SECUNDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CENTRAL CIRCLE -3(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 786/HYD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohana Rao
Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

delay of 3 days is neither intentional nor deliberate but due to the circumstances beyond its control. The same stands condoned. Case is now taken up for adjudication on merits. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds in his appeal: “1. On the facts and the circumstances of the case, the appellate order passed

GAJULAPALLI SHOBAN BABU ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE , TIRUPATI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the A

ITA 296/HYD/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Nov 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Hon'Bleआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.296, 297 & 298/Hyd/2020 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Gajulapalli Shoban Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Babu Central Circle 2(2) Hyderabad Tirupati Pan:Agfpg4314G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Mohd.Afzal, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B. Balakrishna, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 23/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 08/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Mohd.Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

delay of 21 days in filing these appeals are hereby condoned and admitted for adjudication. 3. The assessee has more or less raised common grounds of appeal in all the three appeals. Therefore, for the sake of brevity, grounds of appeal filed for A.Y 2010-11 are hereby reproduced are as under: “1. The order of the learned

GAJULAPALLI SHOBAN BABU ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRLCE , TIRUPATI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the A

ITA 297/HYD/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Nov 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Hon'Bleआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.296, 297 & 298/Hyd/2020 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Gajulapalli Shoban Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Babu Central Circle 2(2) Hyderabad Tirupati Pan:Agfpg4314G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Mohd.Afzal, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B. Balakrishna, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 23/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 08/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Mohd.Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

delay of 21 days in filing these appeals are hereby condoned and admitted for adjudication. 3. The assessee has more or less raised common grounds of appeal in all the three appeals. Therefore, for the sake of brevity, grounds of appeal filed for A.Y 2010-11 are hereby reproduced are as under: “1. The order of the learned

GAJULAPALLI SHOBAN BABU ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRLCE , TIRUPATI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the A

ITA 298/HYD/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Hon'Bleआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.296, 297 & 298/Hyd/2020 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Shri Gajulapalli Shoban Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Babu Central Circle 2(2) Hyderabad Tirupati Pan:Agfpg4314G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Mohd.Afzal, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B. Balakrishna, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 23/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 08/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri Mohd.Afzal, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

delay of 21 days in filing these appeals are hereby condoned and admitted for adjudication. 3. The assessee has more or less raised common grounds of appeal in all the three appeals. Therefore, for the sake of brevity, grounds of appeal filed for A.Y 2010-11 are hereby reproduced are as under: “1. The order of the learned