Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai53 Delhi40 Kolkata20 Bangalore11 Mumbai9 Pune8 Jaipur7 Lucknow6 Patna6 Hyderabad5 Amritsar5 Cuttack5 Ahmedabad4 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Orissa2 Dehradun1 Indore1 Himachal Pradesh1 Raipur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 26319 Section 144A8 Revision u/s 2635 Section 50C4 Section 50C(2)4 Section 50C(1)4 Reassessment4 Limitation/Time-bar4 Section 147

HIMASAGAR KRISHNA MUTHAPPAGARI,TIRUPATI vs. ITO., WARD-2(3), TIRUPATI

ITA 687/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us.

For Appellant: Shri M. Uday Teja, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

condonation of delay involved in filing of an appeal. 5. Succinctly stated, the assessee had filed his return of income for A.Y 2016-17 on 31.03.2018 disclosing an income of Rs.6,43,030/-. Thereafter, the original assessment was framed by the Assessing Officer vide his order passed under Section 143(3) of the Act, dated 24-12-2018, determining

HIMASAGAR KRISHNA MUTHAPPAGARI,TIRUPATI vs. ITO., WARD-2(3), TIRUPATI

VIJAYA LAKSHMI MITTAPALLI,KHAMMAM vs. ITO WARD-1 KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM

HIMASAGAR KRISHNA MUTHAPPAGARI,TIRUPATI vs. ITO., WARD-2(3), TIRUPATI

VIJAYA LAKSHMI MITTAPALLI,KHAMMAM vs. ITO WARD-1 KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM

NAVEEN MITTAPALLI,KHAMMAM vs. ITO WARD-1 KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM

MURALI KRISHNA MITTAPALLI,KHAMMAM vs. ITO WARD-1 KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM

RAMESH MITTAPALLI,KHAMMAM vs. ITO WARD-1 KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM