KIRAN REDDY MUDDASANI,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(3), HYDERABAD
In the result, ITA.No.1157/Hyd
ITA 1157/HYD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.1157 & 1158/Hyd./2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year 2012-2013 Kiran Reddy Muddasani, The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad – 500 035. Ward-9(3), Vs. Telangana. Hyderabad – 500 004. Pan Bftpm6705H Telangana. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Sri P. Vinod, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 15.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 17.10.2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao: These Two Appeals Ita Nos.1157 & 1158/Hyd./2025 By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Two Separate Orders Of The Learned Cit(A)-National Faceless Appeal Centre [In Short “Nfac”], Delhi, Both Dated 26.05.2025 Arising From Assessment Order Passed U/Sec.147 R.W.S.144 Of The Income
For Appellant: Sri P. Vinod, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)
139A(7) and attract penalty under section 2728. It is the duty of the appellant to ensure that any change, replacement, or cancellation of PAN Is duly updated and reflected in the Department's records through proper Intimation and approval. Mere production of ITRs filed under a new PAN does not establish the legitimacy of filling an appeal against
