Search: condonation of delay

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai83 Kolkata74 Calcutta60 Ahmedabad32 Chennai24 Delhi17 Lucknow17 Jaipur15 Surat11 Chandigarh11 Hyderabad10 Indore6 Varanasi5 Bangalore5 Guwahati5 Pune5 Rajkot4 Cuttack4 Telangana2 Patna2 Nagpur1 Agra1 Raipur1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Addition to Income10 Section 271(1)(c)9 Penny Stock9 Penalty9 Deduction9 Section 688 Section 143(1)8 Section 143(2)8 Section 404

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

condoning the delay. and the remaining ground nos.4 to 16 for discussion can be summarized as follows: 1) Ground 4: Disallowance of Rs.24,94,00,000 under section 40A(3) of the Act. 2) Grounds 5 to 7: Disallowance of Rs.21,08,45,001 under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3) Grounds 8 and 9: Payments made

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

DINESH DAGA,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), HYDERABAD

GOVIND KUMAR AGARWAL ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(5), HYDERABAD

NARESH KUMAR AGARWAL ,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(2), HYDERABAD

SUMEET KUMAR AGARWAL ,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(2), HYDERABAD

SAROJ AGARWAL ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), HYDERABAD

VIKAS KUMAR AGARWAL ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), HYDERABAD

GOVINDA KUMAR AGARWAL,HYDEABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), HYDERABAD

NAGESWARA RAO PINNETI,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-16(2), HYDERABAD