BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(ix)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai29Delhi24Pune23Bangalore19Ahmedabad12Kolkata11Chandigarh10Lucknow8Jaipur6Surat6Rajkot4Amritsar3Chennai3Cochin3Hyderabad3Indore3Agra2Jodhpur2Nagpur2Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 12A9Section 12A(1)(ac)8Section 113Section 11(5)3Exemption3Section 80G(5)2Section 1442Limitation/Time-bar2

SRISIVAKESAVA SRIDATTA KSHTRA SEVA SAMAJAM,PRAKASAM vs. ITO., WARD-1, ONGOLE

ITA 893/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.893 & 894/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2025-26) Srisivakesava Sridatta Vs. Income Tax Officer, Kshetra Seva Samajam, Ward-1, Addanki, Prakasam Ongole. District. Pan: Abvas5895E (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri C S Subrahmanyam, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 25/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 26/02/2026 Pronouncement:

For Appellant: Shri C S Subrahmanyam, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

charitable activities such as relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and advancement of other objects of general public utility. Seva Samajam vs. ITO 5. On a perusal of the record, it transpires that the assessee society was granted provisional registration in “Form 10AC” by the CPC, Bangalore on 04.09.2022, valid for three assessment years

SRISIVAKESAVA SRIDATTA KSHETRA SEVA SAMAJAM,PRAKASAM vs. ITO., WARD-1, ONGOLE

ITA 894/HYD/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.893 & 894/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2025-26) Srisivakesava Sridatta Vs. Income Tax Officer, Kshetra Seva Samajam, Ward-1, Addanki, Prakasam Ongole. District. Pan: Abvas5895E (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri C S Subrahmanyam, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 25/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 26/02/2026 Pronouncement:

For Appellant: Shri C S Subrahmanyam, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

charitable activities such as relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and advancement of other objects of general public utility. Seva Samajam vs. ITO 5. On a perusal of the record, it transpires that the assessee society was granted provisional registration in “Form 10AC” by the CPC, Bangalore on 04.09.2022, valid for three assessment years

SEW FOUNDATION,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD-1(4), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 499/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.499/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Sew Foundation Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad (Exemptions), Ward 1(4) Pan:Aaats7433H Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocate V Siva Kumar राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Vinodh Kannan, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 07/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 13/08/2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Raothis Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 27/01/2025 Of The Learned Cit (A)/Addl/Jcit(A)-1 Coimbatore, For The A.Y.2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Learned Cit (A)/Addl/Jcit(A)-5 Coimbatore, 27-01-2025 Is Erroneous, Contrary To Law & Facts Of The Case.

For Appellant: Advocate V Siva KumarFor Respondent: : Shri Vinodh Kannan, Sr. AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 144Section 80G

80G were available in return of income. The learned CIT (A) further ought to have seen that Appellant’s accounts were audited by C.A whose details are furnished in the return of income. Hence, , denying exemption u/s 11 to the Appellant and restricting corpus donations of Rs.28,73,338/- by the Assessing Officer is not justified on the ground that