ABHINAYAVANI NRITYA NIKETAN ,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA NO

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri V. Durga Rao

charitable activities. We find that the finding given by the ld.CIT(E) is not correct for the reason that to run the educational institution particularly ‘Kuchipudi’ dance, some funds are required, for that assessee has collected nominal fee which is not sufficient to run the organization. Out of 42 students, 8 students were taken without collecting fee from them, whatever

ABHINAYAVANI NRITYA NIKETAN,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA NO

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri V. Durga Rao

charitable activities. We find that the finding given by the ld.CIT(E) is not correct for the reason that to run the educational institution particularly ‘Kuchipudi’ dance, some funds are required, for that assessee has collected nominal fee which is not sufficient to run the organization. Out of 42 students, 8 students were taken without collecting fee from them, whatever

MADHUCON PROJECTS LTD, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

245 ITR 0527 Rajasthan High Court ] c) Malabar Industrial Co, Ltd. v.. Commissioner of Income Tax ( 2000 —243 ITR 0083 SC ]” 10. The assessee had challenged the order of ld.CIT(A) dt.31.03.2010 passed u/s 250 with reference to section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A before the ITAT by filing the appeal bearing No.805/Hyd/2010 wherein the assessee besides taking the other

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

245 ITR 0527 Rajasthan High Court ] c) Malabar Industrial Co, Ltd. v.. Commissioner of Income Tax ( 2000 —243 ITR 0083 SC ]” 10. The assessee had challenged the order of ld.CIT(A) dt.31.03.2010 passed u/s 250 with reference to section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A before the ITAT by filing the appeal bearing No.805/Hyd/2010 wherein the assessee besides taking the other

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

245 ITR 0527 Rajasthan High Court ] c) Malabar Industrial Co, Ltd. v.. Commissioner of Income Tax ( 2000 —243 ITR 0083 SC ]” 10. The assessee had challenged the order of ld.CIT(A) dt.31.03.2010 passed u/s 250 with reference to section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A before the ITAT by filing the appeal bearing No.805/Hyd/2010 wherein the assessee besides taking the other